SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ZAG v VOM (Divorce Cause E087 of 2022) [2023] KEKC 20 (KLR) (7 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEKC 20 (KLR) KEKC
Read PDF
Court
KEKC
Case number
20
Citation
[2023] KEKC 20 (KLR)
Decided
7 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePosturePetition for divorce and ancillary reliefCoramMurgor, TS
Holding

The court cannot make a finding on whether the business constitutes matrimonial property due to the nature of the dispute involving company law.

Facts

The parties were married in 2015 and have two children. The petitioner claims the respondent moved out of the matrimonial home, had extra-marital affairs, and physically and verbally assaulted her. The respondent denies these claims and claims the petitioner evicted him from the home and prevented him from accessing the children.

Issues

  1. Dissolution of the marriage
  2. Issuance of divorce certificate
  3. Maintenance
  4. Physical custody
  5. Dowry payment
  6. Matrimonial property determination
  7. Business share determination

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent registered a new company and sold it, but the evidence was not credible. The court could not determine the extent of the value of the company or the extent of the petitioner's financial contribution.

Outcome

The court ordered each party to bear their own costs.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case