SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbebe v National Land Commission & another (Tribunal Case E029 of 2024) [2024] KELAT 1213 (KLR) (2 August 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KELAT 1213 (KLR) KELAT
Read PDF
Court
KELAT
Case number
1213
Citation
[2024] KELAT 1213 (KLR)
Decided
2 August 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand Acquisition DisputePostureAppeal from a previous award of compensationCoramW.K. Korir
The tribunal is properly constituted, and the claimant is entitled to compensation of Kshs. 999,120/-

Facts

The National Land Commission issued an award of compensation for the suit property, but the claimant has not received the payment. The claimant and the commission disagree on the amount of compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the claimant is entitled to a compensatory award of Kshs. 1,533,637/-
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to interest at 13.00% from 21st June 2018 until payment in full
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to loss of income and general damages

Reasoning

The tribunal was properly constituted, and the claimant's primary case failed due to the delay in payment. The commission was ordered to pay the compensation within 21 days and to pay interest from 2nd March 2021.

Outcome

The claimant is awarded compensation of Kshs. 999,120/- and interest from 2nd March 2021.

Orders

  • The claimant is entitled to compensation of Kshs. 999,120/-
  • The claimant is entitled to interest at court rates from 2nd March 2021 until payment in full

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs. 999,120/-
  • Interest at court rates from 2nd March 2021 until payment in full

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Republic V Industrial Property Tribunal Exparte Sanitam Services (EA) Ltd [2012] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case