SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muriithi v Gakui & another (Civil Case 211 of 2013) [2014] KEMC 13 (KLR) (30 October 2014) (Judgment)

[2014] KEMC 13 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
13
Citation
[2014] KEMC 13 (KLR)
Decided
30 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a judgment entered against the defendants for special damages and a final judgment on the liquidated claim of Kshs. 35,576/= special damages pleaded and prayed for in the plaint.CoramALOYCE-PETER-NDEGE
Holding

The court awards Kshs. 120,000/= as general damages for the injuries pleaded and proved by the plaintiff.

Facts

Susan Wambui Muriithi sued James Muya Gakui and John Mwangi Nguitu for injuries sustained in an accident while travelling as a pillion passenger on the defendant's motorcycle. The defendants failed to enter appearance and defend the case, leading to a judgment against them for special damages.

Issues

  1. Award of general damages for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff
  2. Applicability of previous authorities to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff

Reasoning

The court awards general damages based on the nature of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, which included tender swelling of the right knee joint and a partial tear of the lateral collateral ligament of the right knee joint.

Outcome

Judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for special damages of Kshs. 35,576/= and general damages of Kshs. 120,000/=

Orders

  • Plaintiff to get the costs of the suit and interests at court rates

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • DR. PAUl M. Ndirangu Vrs V. K. Pattni & Anor. [2010] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case