SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rose Moturi Mwene v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 3 others [2017] KEMC 77 (KLR)

[2017] KEMC 77 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
77
Citation
[2017] KEMC 77 (KLR)
Decided
15 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner seeks to challenge the deletion of her name from the Gender Top Up List and the subsequent appointment of a different candidate as the elected Member of County Assembly.CoramV. KARANJA
Holding

The court has jurisdiction to hear the petition and dismisses the preliminary objection.

Facts

Petitioner was nominated by the Jubilee Party for a special seat in the Kisii County Assembly. Her name was published in newspapers and she was sworn in as a Member of County Assembly. However, her name was later deleted and replaced by a different candidate.

Issues

  1. Whether the Chief Magistrates Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition regarding the nomination of a Member of County Assembly.
  2. Whether the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of the Political Parties Tribunal.

Reasoning

The court holds that the dispute does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Political Parties Tribunal and that the Chief Magistrates Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition.

Outcome

The preliminary objection is dismissed.

Orders

  • The petition is properly before the court and the court has jurisdiction to hear it.

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Election Act No. 24 of 2011
  • Elections (General) Regulations, 2012
  • Elections (Party Primaries and Party Lists) Regulations, 2017
  • Elections Act No. 24 of 2011
  • Political Parties Act, 2011
Cases cited (2)
  • LilianS case
  • National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) –vs- I.E.B.C Constitutional Petition No. 147 of 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case