SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Osumba Olum v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEMC 80 (KLR)

[2017] KEMC 80 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
80
Citation
[2017] KEMC 80 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureRespondents' appeal from a Chief Magistrate's Court decisionCoramHon Bernard Kasavuli
Holding

Audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying are ordered in eight specific polling stations

Facts

The petitioner alleged electoral malpractices, irregularities, and illegalities in several polling stations during the 2017 election for Member of the County Assembly in Kolwa East Ward.

Issues

  1. Whether audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying should be ordered in all polling stations
  2. Whether scrutiny and recount should be conducted in eight specific polling stations

Reasoning

The court found sufficient grounds for scrutiny and recount in the eight stations due to evidence of irregularities, but not in all 25 stations.

Outcome

Petitioner's application for audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying in eight specific polling stations is granted.

Orders

  • Audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying of election materials in eight specific polling stations
  • Scrutiny of election materials in eight specific polling stations
  • Grant of read-only access to SD Cards for the petitioner to verify voter turnout
  • Supervision of the scrutiny exercise by the court and two court assistants

Remedies

  • Audit, scrutiny, recount, and re-tallying of election materials in eight specific polling stations
  • Grant of read-only access to SD Cards for the petitioner to verify voter turnout

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Elections Act, 2011
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections Petition) Rules, 2017
Cases cited (1)
  • Charles Ong’ondo Were vs Joseph Oyugi Magwagwa Homa Bay No.1 of 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case