SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Keronche Maranga Sammy v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2018] KEMC 32 (KLR)

[2018] KEMC 32 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
32
Citation
[2018] KEMC 32 (KLR)
Decided
23 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner's appeal dismissedCoramS.N MAKILA
Holding

The petition be and is hereby dismissed.

Facts

The petitioner and the 3rd respondent were candidates in the 2017 general election for Gesusu ward, Kisii county. The 3rd respondent was declared the winner.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioner has discharged the burden and standard of proof required by law to prove the allegations contained in his petition.
  2. Whether the illegalities, irregularities and malpractices complained of were so substantial as to affect the outcome and result of the election.
  3. Whether the 3rd Respondent was duly elected and declared as the Member of County Assembly for Gesusu Ward.
  4. What is the consequence of non disclosure of the date of declaration and the results of the elections in the petition.
  5. Which party is liable for the costs of the proceedings herein?

Reasoning

The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the allegations of electoral malpractices and that the irregularities did not affect the outcome of the election.

Outcome

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Instruction fees for the 1st and 2nd respondents capped at Kshs 200,000/=
  • Instruction fees for the 3rd respondent capped at Kshs 200,000/=

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Elections (General) Regulations 2012
  • Election Petition Rules 2017
  • Elections Act, 2011
Cases cited (2)
  • Kiarie Waweru –Vs Beth Wambui Mugo & 2 Others (2008) Eklr At page 6
  • Kalembe Ndile and another vs Patrick Musimba and others Machakos HC EP No. 1 and 7 of 2013 (2013) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case