SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lucas Mulinge Wambua v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (I.E.B.C) & 3 others [2018] KEMC 46 (KLR)

[2018] KEMC 46 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
46
Citation
[2018] KEMC 46 (KLR)
Decided
14 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner's appeal from the decision of the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and the County Assembly of MakueniCoramJAMES N. MWANIKI
Holding

The court found that the nomination and gazettement of the 3rd respondent, JUSTUS MUTUA MASESI, was lawful, legal, and valid, and that the same was undertaken in accordance with the Constitution and Election laws.

Facts

The petitioner, Lucas Mulinge Wambua, is a member of Wiper Democratic Movement-Kenya. The 3rd respondent, JUSTUS MUTUA MASESI, was nominated by the interested party, Wiper Democratic Movement-Kenya, and his name was gazetted by the 1st respondent, the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (IEBC). The petitioner claims that his name and that of the 3rd respondent were not in the original list submitted to the IEBC by their party, and that the final list submitted to the IEBC was irregular, unlawful, and void.

Issues

  1. Whether the nomination and gazettement of the 3rd respondent, JUSTUS MUTUA MASESI as a member of the County Assembly of Makueni was lawful, legal and valid and whether the same was undertaken in accordance with the Constitution and Election laws.
  2. What is the legal effect of the decision dated 1st August 2017 in Complaint No. 512 of 2017 at the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal and whether the same was complied with?
  3. Whether the Petitioner's name was lawfully forwarded to the 1st respondent as being part of the party list of the interested party, Wiper Democratic Movement-Kenya.
  4. Whether the petitioner, Lucas Mulinge Wambua is entitled to be gazetted as a duly nominated member of the County Assembly of Makueni.
  5. What orders should be made as to costs.

Reasoning

The court determined that the petitioner's allegations were not supported by sufficient evidence and that the final list submitted to the IEBC was not irregular, unlawful, or void.

Outcome

The court dismissed the petition.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case