SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Hassan Jimal Abdi v Ibrahim Noor Hussein & 2 others [2018] KEMC 62 (KLR)

[2018] KEMC 62 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
62
Citation
[2018] KEMC 62 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureOriginal trialCoramAs Likoti, Majanja, Moldaver
Holding

The petition succeeds and the election of the 1st respondent as Member of County Assembly for Batalu ward was not free and fair. The election of the 1st Respondent as the Member of County Assembly for Batalu Ward is hereby declared null and void.

Facts

The General elections were held on 8th August 2017 in Batalu ward, where Ibrahim Noor Hussein was declared the elected Member of County Assembly with a vote of 1099 against his closest rival. The petitioner, Hassan Jimal Abdi, challenged the validity of the election.

Issues

  1. Whether the officials of the 3rd Respondent irregularly conducted voting in Batalu polling station beyond the legally required time.
  2. Whether the officials of the 3rd Respondent engaged in acts of ballot stuffing in Batalu polling station and Basineja Polling Station in favor of the 1st Respondent.
  3. Whether the officials of the 3rd Respondent in Batalu polling station blocked the Petitioner’s Agents from recording serial numbers of the seals used to seal the ballot boxes.
  4. Whether the officials of the 3rd Respondent irregularly reopened the sealed ballot boxes for Batalu polling station and Basineja polling station to remove the results declaration forms 36A’s.
  5. Whether the officials of the 3rd Respondent altered results in Form 36A’s in Batalu and Basineja polling station in favor of the 1st Respondent.
  6. Whether the 3rd respondent’s officials engaged in malpractice by colluding with the 1st Respondent through using his motor vehicle to transport election materials.
  7. Whether the IEBC conducted the election in accordance with the law?
  8. Who should bear the costs of this Petition.

Reasoning

The court found irregularities and malpractice in the conduct of the election, including ballot stuffing and irregular reopening of sealed ballot boxes.

Outcome

The 1st Respondent's election as Member of County Assembly for Batalu ward is declared null and void.

Orders

  • That the election of the 1st respondent as Member of County Assembly for Batalu ward was not free and fair.
  • That the election of the 1st Respondent as the Member of County Assembly for Batalu Ward is hereby declared null and void.
  • That the 3rd Respondent is hereby ordered to hold fresh elections for Member of County Assembly for Batalu Ward pursuant to the Constitution and the electoral laws.
  • That the petitioner and the 1st respondent shall have the costs. The costs to be borne by the 3rd respondent.
  • That costs payable is hereby capped at Kshs.300,000/= for the petitioner and Kshs.100,000/- for the 1st respondent.
  • That pursuant to section 86 of the Elections Act, a certificate of determination of this petition to issue to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

Remedies

  • That the 3rd Respondent is hereby ordered to hold fresh elections for Member of County Assembly for Batalu Ward pursuant to the Constitution and the electoral laws.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Elections Act
  • Constitution
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case