SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Karim (Criminal Case 266 of 2016) [2019] KEMC 2 (KLR) (21 May 2019) (Judgment)

[2019] KEMC 2 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
2
Citation
[2019] KEMC 2 (KLR)
Decided
21 May 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminalPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentence for terrorism chargesCoramT. A. SITATI, PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE
Holding

The court sentences the accused to a total of 45 years in prison, with 30 years concurrent and 15 years consecutive for each of the additional counts.

Facts

The accused, Abdul Harun Karim, was arrested on May 9, 2016, and charged with being a foreign terrorist fighter and other terrorism-related offenses. He pleaded guilty to the immigration charge and was sentenced to 2 years in prison. The case then proceeded with additional charges.

Issues

  1. Whether the accused should be sentenced to a custodial or non-custodial sentence
  2. The appropriateness of the sentences for the various counts

Reasoning

The court found the accused to be a threat to national security due to his involvement in terrorist activities and possession of terrorist audio recordings. The court determined a custodial sentence was necessary to deter him and others from similar criminal approaches.

Outcome

The accused was sentenced to 45 years in prison.

Orders

  • Sentences for Counts 1 and 2 to run concurrently for 30 years and 20 years respectively.
  • Sentences for Counts 3, 4, 5, and 6 to run consecutively to the concurrent sentences of Counts 1 and 2.
  • The sentences for Counts 3, 4, 5, and 6 to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to the concurrent sentences of Counts 1 and 2.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Prevention of Terrorism Act
  • Legal Notice 200/2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case