SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Khalif v Abdille Eliyas Jimale County Returning Officer, Mandera North & 2 others (Election Petition E003 of 2022) [2022] KEMC 3 (KLR) (2 November 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEMC 3 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
3
Citation
[2022] KEMC 3 (KLR)
Decided
2 November 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureRespondent seeks to dismiss the petition on grounds of untimely filing and non-payment of security of costs.CoramLaw
Holding

The petition is not dismissed due to untimely filing or non-payment of security of costs.

Facts

The petition was filed on September 8, 2022, and the respondent was declared elected on August 11, 2022. The respondent claims non-payment of security of costs.

Issues

  1. Petition filed on September 8, 2022, within the 28-day deadline.
  2. Respondent claims non-payment of security of costs.
  3. Respondent claims non-service of the petition.

Reasoning

The court finds the petition was filed within the prescribed time and the respondent failed to prove non-payment of security of costs. The court extends the time for depositing security of costs.

Outcome

The petition is not dismissed.

Orders

  • Petition not dismissed due to untimely filing or non-payment of security of costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Elections Act No 24 of 2011
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2013
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petitions Rules, 2017
Cases cited (2)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd (1969) EA 696
  • Gatirau Peter Munya v Dickson Mwenda Kithinji & 2 Others (2014) Supreme Court Petition No 2B
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case