SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Obwanda v Consultancy (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 281 of 2021) [2023] KEMC 310 (KLR) (8 August 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEMC 310 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
310
Citation
[2023] KEMC 310 (KLR)
Decided
8 August 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant v RespondentCoramHON A.P. NDEGE, SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE
Holding

The court found the dismissal to be unfair and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant underpayment, breach of contract, and gratuity.

Facts

Claimant Alice Achieng Obwanda was employed by Respondent Nalis Consultancy as an administrator officer. She was paid a basic salary of Kshs 33,000 but without house allowance. She was dismissed on 28th May 2020 without notice or salary in lieu. She claimed underpayment, breach of contract, and compensation.

Issues

  1. Was the dismissal of the claimant unfair?
  2. Did the claimant receive proper notice and salary in lieu?
  3. Was the claimant entitled to housing accommodation and salary in April and May?

Reasoning

The court held that the employer failed to justify the reasons for termination and that the claimant was not served with proper notice or salary in lieu. The claimant was also entitled to unpaid salary and housing accommodation.

Outcome

The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant Kshs 1,722,350 in total.

Orders

  • Underpayment for 2 years Kshs 422,400.00
  • Breach of contract Kshs 627,000.00
  • Gratuity for 2 years Kshs 16,800.00

Remedies

  • Compensation for underpayment
  • Compensation for breach of contract
  • Compensation for gratuity

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Section 47(5) of Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case