SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

JWGK v AKK (Divorce Cause E988 of 2021) [2023] KEMC 99 (KLR) (21 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEMC 99 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
99
Citation
[2023] KEMC 99 (KLR)
Decided
21 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePosturePetition for Divorce ProceedingCoramADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENO, SENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE
Holding

The petition is struck out. The petition dated 20th Sept 2021 is struck out. No orders on costs. Either party is at liberty to apply for registration as under section 3, 44 and 55 of the Marriage Act. Either party is at liberty to file a fresh petition for consideration before the court noting to annex a copy of the correct marriage certificate in respect of the parties.

Facts

JWGK and AKK solemnized their marriage at the Attorney General’s Chambers in Kenya. They have five children together, all adults as of the hearing. Both are domiciled in Kenya and have no intentions of salvaging the marriage.

Issues

  1. Whether there is evidence of a civil marriage before the court
  2. Whether an order of divorce can issue if a civil marriage is proven

Reasoning

The court found no evidence of a registered customary union on file. The marriage certificate uploaded by the petitioner is unclear and no deed polls were found.

Outcome

Struck out

Orders

  • Petition dated 20th Sept 2021 is struck out
  • No orders on costs
  • Either party is at liberty to apply for registration as under section 3, 44 and 55 of the Marriage Act
  • Either party is at liberty to file a fresh petition for consideration before the court noting to annex a copy of the correct marriage certificate in respect of the parties

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Marriage Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case