SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kiarie v Kariuki (Civil Suit 861 of 2019) [2024] KEMC 164 (KLR) (5 September 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEMC 164 (KLR) Magistrate's Courts
Read PDF
Court
Magistrate's Courts
Case number
164
Citation
[2024] KEMC 164 (KLR)
Decided
5 September 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a consent judgment on liability
Holding

The court awards Kshs. 1,700,000/= for pain and suffering, Kshs. 900,000/= for loss of earning and earning capacity, and Kshs. 100,000/= for future medical expenses.

Facts

The plaintiff, Stephen Ndungu Kiarie, suffered severe injuries to his right eye during an industrial accident at the defendant's premises. The defendant denied the occurrence of the accident but admitted its contribution to the plaintiff's injuries.

Issues

  1. Quantum of damages for pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, and future medical expenses
  2. Whether the plaintiff's claim for diminished earning capacity is valid

Reasoning

The court considered the nature and extent of the injuries and awarded damages based on similar cases.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded Kshs. 756,260.00 less 25% contributions, leaving a net of Kshs. 567,195/=

Orders

  • Award of damages for pain and suffering
  • Award of damages for loss of earning and earning capacity
  • Award of future medical expenses

Remedies

  • Damages for pain and suffering
  • Damages for loss of earning and earning capacity
  • Future medical expenses

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Denshire Muteti Wambua Vrs Kenya Power And Lighting Company (2013) e KLR
  • H. West And Son Ltd Vrs Shepherd (1964) AC 326
  • Paul Njoroge Vrs Abdu Saburi Sabonyo (2015) e KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case