Nato & 3 others v National Environment Management Authority & another (Tribunal Appeal 22 of 2020) [2022] KENET 699 (KLR) (Civ) (12 September 2022) (Judgment)
- Court
- KENET
- Case number
- 699
- Citation
- [2022] KENET 699 (KLR)
- Decided
- 12 September 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the National Environment Management AuthorityCoramMohammed Balala, Christine Kipsang, Bahati Mwamuye, Waithaka Ngaruiya, Kariuki Muigua
Holding
A fresh EIA study should be carried out before granting an EIA licence where the licence had initially been denied due to safety issues.
Facts
The National Environment Management Authority (1st respondent) granted an EIA licence to Focus Container Freight Stations Limited (2nd respondent) for the installation of a bulk liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage depot. The appellants challenged the decision, alleging inadequate public participation in the EIA process.
Issues
- Whether a fresh EIA should be carried out before the issuance of an EIA licence to a proprietor who had initially been denied an EIA licence due to safety issues.
- What did public participation in an environmental impact assessment context entail?
- Whether the National Environment Tribunal had the jurisdiction to make a determination on the ownership of land.
Reasoning
The Tribunal held that the public participation in the EIA process was inadequate and that the 1st respondent should not have granted the EIA licence without subjecting the downsized project to a fresh EIA study.
Outcome
The appeals were allowed, and the EIA licence was cancelled.
Orders
- The EIA licence number NEMA/EIA/PSL/9219 issued to the 2nd respondent on April 30, 2020 is hereby cancelled and/or revoked.
Remedies
- Each party to bear own costs.
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- EMCA
- EIA Regulations
Cases cited (2)
- Section 59 of EMCA
- Regulation 17 of the EIA Regulations
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…