SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bagaja (Suing on Behalf of Buke Abdi Guracha - Deceased) v Kenya Wildlife Service & another (Tribunal Appeal 33 of 2021) [2023] KENET 489 (KLR) (Civ) (9 October 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KENET 489 (KLR) KENET
Read PDF
Court
KENET
Case number
489
Citation
[2023] KENET 489 (KLR)
Decided
9 October 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a decision rejecting a compensation claimCoramEMMANUEL MUMIA, Winnie Tsuma, Kariuki Muigua, Duncan Kuria, Ronald Allamano
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the Appellant is awarded compensation of Kshs 5,000,000 for the death of Buke Abdi Guracha caused by a snake bite.

Facts

The Appellant, Boru Abdikadir Bagaja, sought compensation for the death of his deceased relative, Buke Abdi Guracha, due to a snake bite, but the Ministerial Wildlife Conservation and Compensation Committee (MWCCC) rejected the claim.

Issues

  1. Whether the appeal is time-barred
  2. Whether the Appellant has locus standi
  3. Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to admit additional evidence

Reasoning

The tribunal found the appeal timely and the Appellant had locus standi. The rejection of the claim was unjustified as sufficient evidence was provided.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The 1st Respondent shall pay the Appellant Kshs 5,000,000 in compensation
  • The Respondent shall bear the costs of the Appeal

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs 5,000,000 for the death of Buke Abdi Guracha

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, No 47 of 2013
Cases cited (4)
  • The Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lillian S v Caltex Oil Kenya Ltd
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia v Kenya Commercial Bank & 2 Others
  • Apex Finance International Limited and Another v Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission
  • Goodwill and Trust Investment Ltd and another v Witt and Bush Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case