SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Issack v Jubilee Party; Isack (Interested Party) (Complaint 489 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 122 (KLR) (1 August 2017) (Judgment)

[2017] KEPPDT 122 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
122
Citation
[2017] KEPPDT 122 (KLR)
Decided
1 August 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramM. O. Lwanga (Presiding Member), Desma Nungo (Member), Paul Ngotho (Member)
Holding

The Claim partially succeeds in rectifying the Claimant's sex, identification number, and ethnicity as indicated in the IEBC list.

Facts

The complainant, Zeynab Aliyow Issack, applied for nomination for the position of Member of County Assembly, Marsabit County under the Marginalized Category. Her complaint includes issues with her name appearing in the ordinary gender list, gender indication as male, incorrect entry of National Identity Number digits, and ethnicity being Sakuye instead of Boran.

Issues

  1. Rectification of the Claimant's sex, identification number, and ethnicity as indicated in the IEBC list.
  2. Notification to be issued to IEBC regarding the rectification.

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the nominations were conducted in a fair and justifiable manner, but the Claimant's sex, identification number, and ethnicity were incorrectly indicated.

Outcome

The Claimant's complaint is partially successful.

Orders

  • That the Claimant's sex, identification number, and ethnicity as indicated in the IEBC list be and is hereby rectified to read female instead of male; 24299508 instead of 2429508; and Sakuye instead of Boran respectively.
  • Notification to be issued to IEBC.
  • We make no orders as to costs.

Remedies

  • Rectification of the Claimant's sex, identification number, and ethnicity as indicated in the IEBC list.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case