Osoo v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another; Haji (Interested Party) (Complaint 434 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 341 (KLR) (At Nairobi) (29 July 2017) (Judgment)
- Court
- Public Procurement Tribunal
- Case number
- 341
- Citation
- [2017] KEPPDT 341 (KLR)
- Decided
- 29 July 2017
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal from a previous internal dispute resolution attemptCoramKyalo Mbobu (Chairperson), James Atema (Member), Hassan Abdi (Member), Dr. Adelaide Mbithi (Member)
Holding
The substitution of the claimant's name for the non-qualifying third party is required by law and the internal dispute resolution process was ineffective.
Facts
The claimant's name was left out of the party list for nomination to the Nairobi County Assembly, and a non-qualifying third party, Nimo Omar Haji, was placed on the list instead.
Issues
- Whether the substitution of the claimant's name for the non-qualifying third party is required by law
- Whether the internal dispute resolution process was effective
Reasoning
The claimant's name was not included in the party list for nomination, and a non-qualifying third party was placed on the list instead. This violates the relevant laws.
Outcome
In favor of the claimant
Orders
- The Respondent is directed to replace the Interested Party’s name with the Complainant’s name on the party list within 48 hours of delivery of this judgment.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…