SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bett v United Democratic Alliance; Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Application E001 (NRB) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 973 (KLR) (Civ) (11 September 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEPPDT 973 (KLR) Public Procurement Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Public Procurement Tribunal
Case number
973
Citation
[2022] KEPPDT 973 (KLR)
Decided
11 September 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePolitical Parties DisputesPostureAppeal from a decision of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) partyCoramNyariangi
Holding

The Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the Complaint and grant the orders as framed.

Facts

Ann Jepleting Bett is a registered member of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party. She applied to be considered for nomination for the position of Member of County Assembly for Nandi County Assembly under the Gender Top Up List Category. Her name was published in the Standard Newspaper on July 27, 2022, but was later omitted from a list submitted to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC). She filed a complaint with the Respondent's Electoral and Nomination Dispute Resolution Committee (EDRC), which ruled in her favor.

Issues

  1. Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to entertain this Complaint and grant the orders as framed?
  2. Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to entertain this Complaint and grant the orders as framed?

Reasoning

The Tribunal is guided by the principle that a court of law downs tools in respect of the matter before it the moment it holds the opinion that it is without jurisdiction. The dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal as per Section 40(1) of the Political Parties Act. However, the Respondent's EDRC must be given an opportunity to use the Party's Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanism (IDRM) before the Tribunal's jurisdiction can be invoked.

Outcome

The Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the Complaint and grant the orders as framed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Political Parties Act
Cases cited (1)
  • The Motor Vessel 'Lilian S' case
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case