SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njogu v Wanza (Tribunal Case E1375 of 2022) [2023] KERRT 1177 (KLR) (25 May 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KERRT 1177 (KLR) KERRT
Read PDF
Court
KERRT
Case number
1177
Citation
[2023] KERRT 1177 (KLR)
Decided
25 May 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeRent Restriction DisputePostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramHILLARY K KORIR
The tribunal ordered the tenant to give vacant possession with immediate effect and granted leave to the respondent to levy distress for rent, water, and electricity bills arrears.

Facts

The applicant, Annie Wanjiru Njogu, is a tenant occupying premises located in Kariobangi. The respondent, Agnes Wanza, is the landlady of the premises and has issued a notice to vacate the tenant. The tenant has been accused of being a rent defaulter and has accrued rent arrears.

Issues

  • Whether the tenant should give vacant possession
  • Whether the defense and counterclaim are merited
  • Who should be awarded the costs of the suit

Reasoning

The tribunal found that the tenant had 9 months to vacate and that the property had been sold to a third party, making it fair and just for the tenant to vacate. The defense and counterclaim were found to be merited, and the respondent was awarded costs.

Outcome

The tenant was ordered to vacate the premises with immediate effect.

Orders

  • Tenant to give vacant possession with immediate effect
  • Leave granted to respondent to levy distress for rent, water, and electricity bills arrears
  • Respondent awarded costs

Remedies

  • Vacant possession
  • Levy of distress for rent, water, and electricity bills
  • Award of costs
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case