Pevans East Africa Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes; Shop and Deliver Limited & 6 others (Interested Parties) (Tax Appeal 304, 141, 175, 198, 200, 265, 302 & 305 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2019] KETAT 19 (KLR) (6 November 2019) (Judgment)
- Court
- Tax Appeals Tribunal
- Case number
- 19
- Citation
- [2019] KETAT 19 (KLR)
- Decided
- 6 November 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a demand for withholding taxCoramNot explicitly named in the provided text, but implied to be the presiding judges of the Tax Appeals Tribunal.
Holding
The Appellant has Locus Standi and the doctrine of Res Judicata is not applicable.
Facts
Pevans East Africa Limited was demanded Ksh 2,570,692,379 in withholding tax on winnings for May 2019 by the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes. The company objected to the demand and disputed the computation of the taxes.
Issues
- Whether the Appellant has Locus Standi in filing the Appeal in respect of deductions of Withholding tax on winnings.
- Whether the doctrine of Res Judicata is applicable herein.
- What constitutes winnings under the Income Tax Act.
- Whether the Respondent erred in issuing demands for withholding tax against the Appellant.
- Whether the additional evidence tendered by the Respondent in its submissions during the proceedings is unprocedural and ought to be expunged from the record.
Reasoning
The Tribunal found that the Appellant had sufficient connection to the Respondent's demand to support its participation in the case. The Respondent's submission that only the punter is entitled to object to the application of the 20% rate of WHT to the pay-outs as opposed to the winnings was not supported.
Outcome
The Appeal is merited and succeeds.
Orders
- The Respondent's demands be and are hereby set aside.
- The Orders of this Tribunal in this Test Suit No.304 of 2019 shall apply to each of the Seven Interested Parties and to the respective matters filed by them, being Appeals Nos.141 of 2019, 175 of 2019, 198 of 2019, 200 of 2019, 265 of 2019, 305 of 2019 and 302 of 2019.
- Each party shall bear its costs.
Remedies
- Set aside the Respondent's demands.
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Tax Appeals Tribunal Act, 2013 (No.40 of 2013)
- Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act, Chapter 131, Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
- Petition No. 9 of 2018 George Lesaloi Selelo -vs- Commissioner General, KRA & 2 Others as consolidated with Petition No.10 of 2018, Bluejay Limited t/a Betway -vs- Cabinet Secretary National Treasury & Others.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…