SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ngurumani Traders Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Appeal 125 of 2017) [2019] KETAT 21 (KLR) (17 December 2019) (Judgment)

[2019] KETAT 21 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
21
Citation
[2019] KETAT 21 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a tax assessmentCoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judges
Holding

The preliminary objection is not valid as the Appellant failed to submit documents in support of its objection as required by section 51 (3) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015.

Facts

The Appellant, Ngurumani Traders Ltd, was called for a meeting regarding its tax affairs. The Respondent, Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement, issued notices requesting the Appellant to provide records and documents for tax assessment. The Appellant raised objections to the assessment and filed a preliminary objection.

Issues

  1. Whether the Appellant’s preliminary objection dated 12th September 2017 is valid
  2. Whether the Appellant’s objection was valid
  3. Whether the Respondent’s assessment of the Appellant’s tax affairs is proper
  4. Whether the Tribunal can grant the prayers sought by the Appellant

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Appellant’s objection was not valid due to non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of section 51 (3) of the Tax Procedures Act, 2015, which requires the objection to state precisely the grounds of objection, the amendments required to be made to correct the decision, and the reasons for the amendments.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed
  • The Appellant’s objection is deemed invalid

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Tax Procedures Act, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.9 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case