SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

McKinsey and Company Inc Africa Proprietary Ltd v Commissioner of Legal Services and Board Cordination (Appeal 199 of 2020) [2021] KETAT 137 (KLR) (1 April 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KETAT 137 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
137
Citation
[2021] KETAT 137 (KLR)
Decided
1 April 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a confirmed assessmentCoramAFULA, Catherine N. Mutava, Abraham K. Kiprotich
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the income is not subject to Withholding Tax under Article 7 of the DTA and sets aside the Objection Decision.

Facts

The Appellant, McKinsey and Company Inc. Africa Proprietary Ltd, paid professional fees to its related party resident in South Africa. The Respondent, Commissioner of Legal Services and Board Coordination, demanded Withholding Tax on the fees under the Kenya-South Africa Double Taxation Agreement (DTA).

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent erred in demanding Withholding Tax from the Appellant in respect of professional fees paid to its related party resident in South Africa.
  2. How the income is treated under the provisions of the Kenya-South Africa DTA.

Reasoning

The Tribunal interprets the Kenya-South Africa DTA, relying on the UN and OECD Models and the Vienna Convention on Interpretation of Treaties, to conclude that the income is not specifically captured under the DTA and thus is not subject to Withholding Tax.

Outcome

The Appeal has merit and the Tribunal sets aside the Objection Decision.

Orders

  • The Objection Decision dated 6th April, 2020 is hereby set aside.
  • No orders as to cost.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya-South Africa Double Taxation Agreement
  • Kenya Revenue Authority Act, Cap 469 of the Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 1.6 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case