SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lelesiit v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 256 of 2019) [2021] KETAT 166 (KLR) (3 December 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KETAT 166 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
166
Citation
[2021] KETAT 166 (KLR)
Decided
3 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Domestic TaxesCoramSimon Eteni Lelesiit
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the Respondent did not err in law and fact by raising the income tax assessment for the year 2018 and the VAT assessment for December 2018.

Facts

The Appellant, Simon Eteni Lelesiit, was employed by the Samburu County Government. The Respondent, Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, issued additional assessments for income tax and VAT on the Appellant's individual PIN based on payments made by Samburu County to businesses owned by the Appellant.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent erred in law and fact by raising the income tax assessment for the year 2018.
  2. Whether the Respondent erred in law and fact by forcefully registering the Appellant for VAT.
  3. Whether the Respondent erred in law and fact by raising a VAT assessment on the Appellant for the month of December 2018.

Reasoning

The Tribunal notes that the Respondent treated the Appellant's business registered in his individual PIN as income from the business and charged tax on the same in absence of proof to the contrary. The Tribunal relies on Section 30 of the TAT Act 2013 and Section 59 of the TPA on Production of Records to find that the Appellant failed to provide sufficient records to support his assertions.

Outcome

Affirmed

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.5 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case