SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Hijaz Technologies Limited v Commissioner of Legal Services & Board Coordination (Tribunal Appeal 324 of 2022) [2023] KETAT 116 (KLR) (17 March 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KETAT 116 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
116
Citation
[2023] KETAT 116 (KLR)
Decided
17 March 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a rejection of VAT return amendmentsCoramE.N Wafula, Cynthia B. Mayaka, Grace Mukha, Ak Kiprotich, Jephthaah Njagi
Holding

The Tribunal found that the Respondent’s Rejection Notices for Amended Return were not in contravention of the law.

Facts

Hijaz Technologies Limited filed two applications to amend its VAT returns for September 2012 and October 2012, which were acknowledged by the Commissioner of Legal Services & Board Coordination. The applications were later rejected. The Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal against the objection decision.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent’s Rejection Notices for Amended Return were in contravention of the law.
  2. Whether the Respondent erred in the assessment of VAT on the Appellant.

Reasoning

The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had lodged two applications for amendment of its VAT returns, which were acknowledged by the Respondent. The Respondent rejected the applications based on the objection that was before the Commissioner, which was related to additional assessments when sales data was compared to import data.

Outcome

Affirmed

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case