SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kiri Consult Limited v Commissioner of Legal Services & Board Coordination (Tribunal Appeal 34 of 2022) [2023] KETAT 146 (KLR) (Civ) (10 February 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KETAT 146 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
146
Citation
[2023] KETAT 146 (KLR)
Decided
10 February 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Legal Services & Board CoordinationCoramE.N Wafula, R. Oluch, E. Cheluget
Holding

The Tribunal holds that the appellant was not included in the initial exemption bracket and that the respondent was right in declining to issue an exemption certificate to the appellant.

Facts

The appellant, Kiri Consult Limited, was contracted by Kenya Roads Board to undertake consultancy services under the Kenya Transport Sector Support Project. The appellant attempted to obtain a VAT exemption certificate from the respondent, but was unsuccessful. The appellant was not included in the initial exemption letter from the National Treasury.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent's objection decision dated December 15, 2021 was valid and lawful

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the appellant was not included in the initial exemption letter from the National Treasury and that the respondent was right in declining to issue an exemption certificate to the appellant. The appellant had separate sub-consultancy agreements with KRB, and the exemption was only applicable to the relationship between SMEC and KRB.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • VAT Act
  • Kenya Revenue Authority Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case