SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Viraj Development Limited v Commissioner of Investigations and Enforcement (Appeal 449 of 2022) [2023] KETAT 338 (KLR) (Civ) (9 June 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KETAT 338 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
338
Citation
[2023] KETAT 338 (KLR)
Decided
9 June 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision confirming tax assessmentsCoramVIRA, VIRA
Holding

The Tribunal found that the respondent was justified in confirming the tax assessments based on the cash receipt approach.

Facts

The appellant, Viraj Development Limited, was investigated by the respondent, Commissioner of Investigations and Enforcement, for non-remittance of taxes. The investigation covered the period from January 2015 to December 2019. The respondent confirmed tax liability totaling Kshs 76,369,287.30.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent was justified in confirming the tax assessments

Reasoning

The Tribunal determined that the respondent's cash receipt approach was justified as it was based on the information available and the variance between bank deposits and income declared.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Income Tax Act
  • Companies Act
  • Kenya Revenue Authority Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case