SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Alfazance Africa Consulting Limited v Commisioner of DomesticTaxes (Miscellaneous Application E086 of 2023) [2023] KETAT 583 (KLR) (29 June 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KETAT 583 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
583
Citation
[2023] KETAT 583 (KLR)
Decided
29 June 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureAppeal out of time and for the proper filing of the Memorandum of Appeal and Statement of FactsCoramERIC N. WAFULA, CYNTHIA B. MAYAKA, RODNEY O. OLUOCH, ELISHAH N. NJERU, ABRAHAM K. KIPROTICH
Holding

The Tribunal grants leave to file the appeal out of time and orders the proper filing of the Memorandum of Appeal and Statement of Facts.

Facts

The Applicant, Alfazance Africa Consulting Limited, alleges it was not served with the Invalidation letter, while the Respondent, Commisioner of Domestic Taxes, claims service through email and postal address. The Applicant disputes the service and seeks to file the appeal out of time.

Issues

  1. Service of the Invalidation letter
  2. Proper filing of the appeal and documents

Reasoning

The Tribunal finds the Applicant's claim of non-service valid and grants leave to file the appeal out of time, while ordering the proper filing of the appeal documents.

Outcome

Appeal granted leave to file out of time and proper filing of documents ordered.

Orders

  • Leave to file appeal out of time
  • Proper filing of Memorandum of Appeal and Statement of Facts within 15 days
  • Respondent to file and serve response within statutory timelines
  • No orders as to costs

Remedies

  • Leave to file appeal out of time
  • Proper filing of appeal documents

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Tax Procedure Act (TPA)
  • Tax Appeals Tribunal Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Revenue Authority vs Man Diesel & Turbo Se (2021) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case