SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mjengo & General Hardware Ltd v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 1136 of 2022) [2023] KETAT 863 (KLR) (24 November 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KETAT 863 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
863
Citation
[2023] KETAT 863 (KLR)
Decided
24 November 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Domestic TaxesCoramMUTISO MAKAU
Holding

The Tribunal finds and holds that the Appeal partially succeeds, varying the Respondent's Objection Decision on the following terms: the assessment on under-declared VAT sales, overstatement of purchases, and double claims in input tax are upheld; the assessment on overclaimed salaries and wages expenses is set aside.

Facts

The Appellant, Mjengo & General Hardware Ltd, was assessed Kshs. 10,954,728.00 for Corporation tax and Kshs. 1,865,253.00 for VAT. The Respondent, Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, issued an Objection Decision dated 9th September 2022 partially accepting the Appellant's objection. The Appellant appealed the decision.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent's Objection Decision dated 9th September 2022 is incorrect

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to provide necessary documents and information to validate its objection, thus the Respondent was justified in confirming the assessment on disallowed purchase invoices. The Tribunal also noted that the Appellant discharged its burden of proof for the salaries and wages expense by providing the muster roll detailing the name, daily attendance, gross pay, and signatory of the recipient.

Outcome

The Appeal is partially successful.

Orders

  • The Respondent’s Objection decision is varied on the following terms: the assessment on under-declared VAT sales, overstatement of purchases, and double claims in input tax are upheld; the assessment on overclaimed salaries and wages expenses is set aside; each party bears its own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Tax Procedures Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case