SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Modern Ways Limited v Commissioner of Customs and Border Control (Tax Appeal 1551 of 2022) [2024] KETAT 341 (KLR) (8 March 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KETAT 341 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
341
Citation
[2024] KETAT 341 (KLR)
Decided
8 March 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision by the Commissioner of Customs and Border ControlCoramE.N Wafula, D.K Ngala, A.M Diriye, S.S Oloolchike
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the Respondent is authorized by law to impose Import duty according to the tari classification under the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System provided by the World Customs Organization.

Facts

The Appellant, Modern Ways Limited, manufactures and distributes mineral supplements and animal health products. The Respondent, the Commissioner of Customs and Border Control, issued audit findings declaring the Appellant had declared the wrong tari on imports of licking blocks for animals, demanding Kshs 23,866,730 in taxes.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent’s tari re-classication should be upheld.

Reasoning

The Tribunal analyzed the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System and the World Customs Organization's Explanatory Notes, concluding that the Appellant's product, Vitalblock, should be classified under HS Code 2309.90.90, not 2501.00.90.

Outcome

The Tribunal upholds the Respondent's tari re-classication.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Revenue Authority Act
  • East Africa Community Customs Management Act, 2004
Cases cited (2)
  • Commissioner of Customs and Excise v Export Trading Company Limited
  • Republic v. Commissioner General & Another Ex-Parte Awal Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case