SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Little Cribs Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 1580 of 2022) [2024] KETAT 628 (KLR) (5 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KETAT 628 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
628
Citation
[2024] KETAT 628 (KLR)
Decided
5 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from an objection decisionCoramCHRISTINE A. MUGA, BONIFACE K. TERER, DELILAH K. NGALA, SPENCER S. OLOLCHIKE, GEORGE KASHINDI
Holding

The Appeal is dismissed, and the objection decision is upheld.

Facts

Little Cribs Limited filed an objection to an additional VAT assessment issued by the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes. The Appellant argued that the Respondent should not have confirmed the additional assessments, but the Respondent relied on Section 17(2) and (3) of the VAT Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent’s objection decision dated 4th November, 2022 was justifiable.

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to provide the required documentary evidence as per Section 17(3) of the VAT Act, thus failing to meet the burden of proof.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, objection decision upheld

Orders

  • The Appeal be and is hereby dismissed.
  • The objection decision dated 4th November, 2022 be and is hereby upheld.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • VAT Act
  • Tax Appeals Tribunal Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Gitere Kahura Investments Ltd Appeal No. 16 of 2019
  • Digital Box Limited v Commissioner of domestic investigations and Enforcement [2020]
  • Darwine Wholesalers Limited v Commissioner of Investigations and Enforcement (Income Tax Appeal E051 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 23537 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case