SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shemay Medtech Limited v Commissioner of Customs and Border Control (Tax Appeal E1472 of 2024) [2025] KETAT 403 (KLR) (8 August 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KETAT 403 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
403
Citation
[2025] KETAT 403 (KLR)
Decided
8 August 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppeal from a decision to reclassify goods and demand short levied taxesCoramRM MUTUMA, CHAIR, T VIKIRU, M MAKAU
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the Respondent was justified in demanding short levied taxes as the Appellant failed to comply with the time limit for review as stipulated in Section 229(1) of the East Africa Customs Management Act, 2004.

Facts

Shemay Medtech Limited imported OKI series bed head units under HS code 8537.10.00, but the Commissioner reclassified them under HS code 9402.90.90. The Appellant appealed, and the Commissioner upheld the reclassification and demanded short levied taxes.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent erred in classifying OKI series bed under Tari Code 9402.90.90 instead of Tari Code 8537.10.00 and 9032.90.00
  2. Whether the Respondent was justied in demanding short levied taxes

Reasoning

The Appellant failed to lodge an application for review within 30 days of the Tari Ruling, as required by Section 229(1) of the EACCMA. The Respondent upheld the Tari Ruling and demanded short levied taxes, which the Tribunal found to be justified.

Outcome

The Appellant's appeal was dismissed.

Orders

  • The Respondent was justied to conrm its reclassication of the Appellant’s goods and to undertake enforcement measures

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • East Africa Customs Management Act, 2004
  • Companies Act
Cases cited (1)
  • HCITA E027 of 2024 Commissioner of Customs and Border Control vs. Rex International Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case