SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ngulli v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Miscellaneous Application E029 of 2025) [2025] KETAT 405 (KLR) (1 August 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KETAT 405 (KLR) Tax Appeals Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Tax Appeals Tribunal
Case number
405
Citation
[2025] KETAT 405 (KLR)
Decided
1 August 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent sought to enforce Agency Notice, Applicant sought extension of time and stay of enforcementCoramMUTISO MAKAU, BONIFACE K. TERER, ELISHAH NJERU
Holding

The Tribunal granted leave to file appeal out of time due to reasonable cause

Facts

Applicant was granted leave to file appeal out of time due to illness, but Respondent argued the delay was inordinate.

Issues

  1. Whether the delay in filing appeal was reasonable
  2. Whether the delay was inordinate

Reasoning

The Tribunal considered the grounds for delay and found them reasonable, granting leave to file appeal out of time.

Outcome

Leave to file appeal out of time granted

Orders

  • Leave to file appeal out of time granted
  • Applicant to file Notice of Appeal within 7 days
  • Respondent to file Statement of Facts within 30 days
  • Agency Notices lifted unconditionally
  • No orders as to costs

Remedies

  • Leave to file appeal out of time
  • Lift of Agency Notices

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Tax Appeals Tribunal Act Cap. 469A
Cases cited (4)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs. Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others [2014] eKLR
  • Wasike vs. Swala [1984] KLR 591
  • Mwangi & 2 others (Suing on their own behalf and on behalf of Twendane Company Limited) vs. Kanyamwi Trading Company Limited [2015] KECA 967 (KLR)
  • Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo vs. Paul Kipkorir Kibet [2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case