Nakili Sacco & 3 others v National Transport and Safety Authority & 2 others (Tribunal Case 17 of 2016) [2016] KETLABT 7 (KLR) (7 December 2016) (Judgment)

Facts

Nakili Sacco and other Sacco companies were licensed by the National Transport and Safety Authority (NTSA) to operate public service vehicles. Nakili Sacco filed an appeal alleging unlawful licensing of a new operator, Espresso Ltd, and violation of their right to a response regarding a route extension application.

Issues

1. Whether the Second Respondent complied with the requirement to have a minimum of 30 vehicles for registration.
2. Whether the Second Appellant's right was violated for not receiving a response from NTSA regarding their application for route extension.
3. Whether Saccos can lay claim on the ownership of specific picking and dropping points.

Reasoning

The Board found that the Second Respondent complied with the requirement of having 30 vehicles for registration. However, it noted that NTSA had not responded to Super Metro's application for route extension and ordered NTSA to respond within seven days.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, order for NTSA to respond to Super Metro's application within seven days.

Authorities cited