SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kangemi Matatu Owners Sacco Society v National Transport and Safety Authority & 2 others; Westlands Watch for Peace, Gender & Development & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Appeal 7 of 2020) [2022] KETLABT 780 (KLR) (Civ) (12 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KETLABT 780 (KLR) KETLABT
Read PDF
Court
KETLABT
Case number
780
Citation
[2022] KETLABT 780 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the National Transport and Safety AuthorityCoramMesser
Holding

The Court held that the NTSA did not need to involve stakeholders before granting the license to Latema Travellers Bus and Safaris Ltd.

Facts

Kangemi Matatu Owners Sacco Society is a cooperative licensed by the National Transport and Safety Authority to operate service vehicles. Latema Travellers Bus and Safaris Ltd is a licensed public service vehicle operator. Nairobi City County is a county government that has the mandate to manage devolved transport functions. The Appellant and interested parties argue for public participation before granting licenses, while the Respondents argue for the authority's discretion.

Issues

  1. Whether the National Transport and Safety Authority (NTSA) is required to involve stakeholders before granting a license to Latema Travellers Bus and Safaris Ltd

Reasoning

The Court considered the provisions of the National Transport and Safety Authority Act No 33 of 2012 and the Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015, and found that the Act gives the NTSA discretion to grant or deny licenses without requiring public participation.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • The decision to grant the license to Latema Travellers Bus and Safaris Ltd is upheld

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • National Transport and Safety Authority Act No 33 of 2012
  • Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case