SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ALCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED V STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF UGANDA & 2 OTHERS (Civil Appeal 2 of 2011) [2012] RC 9 (KLR) (16 March 2012)

[2012] RC 9 (KLR) RC
Read PDF
Court
RC
Case number
9
Citation
[2012] RC 9 (KLR)
Decided
16 March 2012
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Ruling of the First Instance DivisionCoramJ. Busingye PJ, Law, Nyarangi
Holding

The Appellant's appeal is allowed. The Ruling of the First Instance Division dated the 24.9.2011 cannot be allowed to stand. The court declines to assume original jurisdiction and dispose of the preliminary objections raised by the Respondents.

Facts

The Appellant contracted the National Social Security Fund, Uganda (NSSF) to construct 'Workers House' in Kampala. NSSF terminated the agreement and initiated arbitration proceedings. The Appellant was awarded US $8,858,469.97 in the arbitration. The matter is now before the Supreme Court as Civil Appeal No. 15 of 2009.

Issues

  1. Procedure do not give the Appellate Division concurrent jurisdiction with the First Instance Division
  2. Whether the Reference was improperly before the Court as against the First Respondent
  3. Whether the Reference was time barred
  4. Whether the Claimant has no rights under the Protocol on the Establishment of the East African Community for acts that arose prior to the coming into force of the Protocol

Reasoning

The court declines to assume original jurisdiction and dispose of the preliminary objections raised by the Respondents. The court is not aware of any provision in the Treaty that confers concurrent jurisdiction with the First Instance Division.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The Ruling and Order of the 1st Instance Division of the Court dated the 24.9.2011 be set aside
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case