SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

East African Law Society v Secretary General of the East African Community [2013] RC 9 (KLR)

[2013] RC 9 (KLR) RC
Read PDF
Court
RC
Case number
9
Citation
[2013] RC 9 (KLR)
Decided
14 February 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePublic Interest LitigationPostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramJOHNSTON BUSINGYE, JOHN MKWAWA, ISAAC LENAOLA
Holding

The Court finds that the protocols are inconsistent with the Treaty and directs the parties to bear their respective costs.

Facts

The East African Law Society filed a reference under various articles of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community, alleging inconsistencies between certain protocols and the Treaty.

Issues

  1. Inconsistency between Article 24(1)(e) of the Protocol Establishing the East African Community Customs Union and Article 54(2) of the Protocol for the Establishment of the East Africa Community Common Market with Articles 27(1), 38(1), and (2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.
  2. Inconsistency between Article 24(1)(e) of the Protocol Establishing the East African Community Customs Union and Article 38(1) and (2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the protocols purport to oust the jurisdiction of the East African Court of Justice in matters relating to East African Community regional integration processes, which is inconsistent with the Treaty.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • The parties shall bear their respective costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community
  • Protocol Establishing the East African Community Customs Union
  • Protocol for the Establishment of the East Africa Community Common Market
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case