Kenyan case law

Kabui v Orient Savings and Credit Coop Limited (Tribunal Case 272/E374 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 515 (KLR) (23 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs 473,368.97/=

Sacco v Kibelio (Tribunal Case 377 of 2020) [2025] KECOPT 569 (KLR) (23 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Claimants established their case on a balance of probability and judgment is entered in favour of the Claimants for payment of Kshs. 1,311,446/= plus cost and interest at the Tribunal’s rate from the date of this judgment.

Muhoro v Metropolitan Sacco Society Sacco (Tribunal Case E607 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 516 (KLR) (Civ) (23 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ Claim is merited, judgment in favor of Claimant for Kshs. 133,536/= plus cost and interest at Tribunal rates

Mwobobia v Solutions Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case E164 of 2025) [2025] KECOPT 553 (KLR) (23 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The Tribunal finds that the Claimant has not demonstrated a prima facie case and cannot be adequately compensated by damages, thus the injunction prayers are denied.

Osoro v Postmail Sacco Society Limited (Tribunal Case E671 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 511 (KLR) (23 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ This Tribunal finds that the Claimant has explained the two figures in his letter and statement of claim. The difference is due to the non-response by the Respondent to stop Claimant’s deductions on receipt of the withdrawal notice letter.

Muthoni v Capital Sacco Limited & another (Tribunal Case 45/E001 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 557 (KLR) (18 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The Tribunal allows the Notice of Motion Application dated 2/4/2024 in terms of prayer no. 4, granting an injunction to prevent the sale of the Claimant's property pending the hearing and determination of the Claim.

Mugo & 4 others v Akungu (Tribunal Case 15/E018 of 2022) [2025] KECOPT 525 (KLR) (16 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The respondent is found not to have shown cause why he should not be arrested for failure to pay the judgment sum

Ngunjiri v Stima Investment Cooperative Society (Tribunal Case 905/ E 975 of 2022) [2025] KECOPT 530 (KLR) (16 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claim. The Claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs. 480,000/=. The Claimant is not entitled to general damages.

Moses v Ombuna & another (Tribunal Case 264/E315 of 2022) [2025] KECOPT 517 (KLR) (16 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Claimant is partially successful, and judgement is entered in favour of the Claimant for the sum of Kshs. 89,184 plus costs and interest.

Siraji Savings Credit Limited v Mungathia (Tribunal Case 460/E258 of 2021) [2025] KECOPT 521 (KLR) (Civ) (16 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The notice of motion dated 31.7.2025 is allowed in terms of Prayer 2.

Amica Savings and Credit v Musyoka (Tribunal Case 1050 of 2018) [2025] KECOPT 524 (KLR) (16 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Statement of Claim and Counterclaim both fail.

Muthoni v Capital Sacco Limited & another (Tribunal Case 45/E001 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 540 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The application is dismissed with no order as to costs, as the issues have been previously heard and determined in a similar application.

Ngamau v Orient Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case 372 of 2017) [2025] KECOPT 527 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The claimant's application is merited, and the suit is reinstated for hearing on a priority basis.

Otieno & 2 others v TD & 4 others (Tribunal Case E016 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 504 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The claim lacks merit and is dismissed

Ngige v Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd (Tribunal Case E1014 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 506 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The prayer for general damages fails.

Maina v Metropolitan National Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case 140/E275 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 514 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The claim is well prosecuted and merited, and judgment is entered in favor of the claimant for Kshs. 248,200/+

Nene & 3 others v Kiriita Pyrethrum & Vegetable Growers Cooperative Society Limited (Tribunal Case 163.E206 of 2023) [2025] KECOPT 505 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The objection to the second Claimant's testimony is dismissed.

Ben v Mugo (Tribunal Case 785/E917 of 2023) [2025] KECOPT 529 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ Ben is not entitled to the claimed damages and interest, but interest on the recovered amount will be awarded at Tribunal rates.

Joinas Sacco Society Limited v Wamuha (Tribunal Case 251/E354 of 2023) [2025] KECOPT 547 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Ruling)

Mwinyihaji v Transcom Sacco Society Limited (Tribunal Case 249/E299 of 2022) [2025] KECOPT 509 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ We find that the claim is merited and enter judgment in favour of the Claimant for Kshs. 243,132/= plus cost and interest at Tribunal rates.

Lumumba v Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd (Tribunal Case 477/E646 of 2023) [2025] KECOPT 507 (KLR) (9 October 2025) (Judgment)

✦ Claimant's claim for refund of Ksh. 332,811/- is partly merited, and the Respondent is ordered to refund this amount immediately.

Mwaura & 3 others v Wanjiku (Tribunal Case E667 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 463 (KLR) (29 September 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Summary Judgment for Kshs. 252,100/= is upheld with costs and interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing till payment in full.

Miheso v Kioo Sacco Society Limited; Co-operative Bank of Kenya & another (Garnishee) (Tribunal Case 532/E427 of 2023) [2025] KECOPT 472 (KLR) (29 September 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The application is dismissed, and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant a sum of Kshs. 120,000 from the garnisheed account and retain Kshs. 10,000 as their costs payment.

Njuguna v Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd (Tribunal Case 266/E362 of 2024) [2025] KECOPT 482 (KLR) (29 September 2025) (Judgment)

✦ The Claimant's Statement of Claim succeeds, and judgment is entered in her favour for the sum of Kshs. 441,460.95/= with costs and interest at Tribunal rates.

Ndinguri & 3 others v Kenya Usa Diaspora Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited & another (Tribunal Case E198 of 2025) [2025] KECOPT 503 (KLR) (25 September 2025) (Ruling)

✦ The Tribunal extended the temporary injunction for a period of 3 months from the date of this ruling in order to enable the Claimant to regularize his loan account.