Kenyan case law
-
Ciamutegi & 2 others v Njoka & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E014 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7487 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court dismissed the application as it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the requests for stay of proceedings, temporary injunction, and status quo order.
-
Mwaniki & another v Muiru (Environment and Land Case 1 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7664 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Plaintiffs have not acquired the land by adverse possession.
-
Kanyi v Iseka Limited & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E025 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7584 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
-
Nderu (Suing as administrator of the Estate of Gacheru Kanungu - Deceased) v Babu (Environment and Land Case 270 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 7588 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is an abuse of the court process and is hereby dismissed with costs.
-
Mutiso v Mwende (Environment and Land Case E364 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 7642 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is struck out with costs as the change of counsel was not properly made in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules.
-
Kukam Limited v Kenya National Highways Authority & 3 others (Land Case 950 of 2014) [2025] KEELC 7587 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court finds that the Applicant is the registered proprietor of the suit property and that the Intended 4th Defendant is a necessary party. An order of temporary injunction is granted.
-
Ngigi & 4 others v Mbaria & 2 others (Environment and Land Case E115 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7676 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application and the same is hereby struck out with costs.
-
Republic v Chief Executive Officer & 2 others; Shibule t/a Thomas Shibule Traders (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Planning Judicial Review E001 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7544 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The court ordered the respondents to pay the decretal amount of Kshs. 24,523,214/= awarded in the judgment.
-
Kemei v Kemei & another (Environment and Land Appeal E013 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7419 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Appeal lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with costs.
-
Mutero v Karanja & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 21 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7386 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Court finds that the Plaintiff has not met the requirements for the grant of an order of adverse possession.
-
Kenya Power & Lighting Company PLC v Omanga (Land Case Appeal E004 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7523 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The appeal is struck out in limine for being incompetent and an abuse of the court process.
-
Papu v Waweru & another (Environment and Land Case 263 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 7475 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The suit abated due to the plaintiff's death, and the court has no jurisdiction to appoint a legal representative for the deceased plaintiff.
-
Sodawalla v Bhaiji & 2 others; Gohil (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case E053 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7561 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The dismissal order is reviewed and set aside, and the plaintiff's application is reinstated for hearing on merit.
-
Kones v Sambut Tea Limited & 2 others (Sued as the Administrators of the Estate of the Late Kipkalya Kiprono Kones (Deceased)) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7425 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The Plaintiff/Applicant's application is dismissed with costs.
-
Fesehaye v Nairobi City County Government (Environment and Planning Civil Case E006 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7536 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with no order as to costs since it is undefended.
-
Mugambi v Mwai & 3 others (Civil Appeal E021 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7453 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The appeal is dismissed, and the temporary injunction is not granted.
-
Chacha v Koroso (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E011 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7433 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The court finds the plaintiff's claim meritorious and orders the land to be sub-divided and a portion given a new number and title deed issued in the plaintiff's name.
-
M’Iburi & 4 others v Iburi (Environment and Land Case E004 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7514 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The court ordered the Defendant to sub-divide the land parcel and transfer the resultant sub-divisions to the Plaintiffs and themselves.
-
Okech v Oloo (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E017 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7527 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The court held that the plaintiff did not acquire title to the suit land by adverse possession and dismissed the suit.
-
Boro v Mboro & another (Environment and Land Case E031 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7408 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The Plaintiff's application is dismissed as she has failed to establish a prima facie case and has not demonstrated irreparable harm.
-
Oriedo v Khayati (Environment and Land Appeal E046 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7480 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The court did not grant the stay of execution pending appeal.
-
Kaliuntu v Lemasaria (Environment and Land Appeal E024 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7431 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is allowed, and the judgment and decree of the learned chief magistrate are set aside. The respondents' suit is dismissed, and the appellant is awarded permanent injunction and costs.
-
Republic v Nairobi District Land Registrar; Kirui (Interested Party); Ramadhan (Ex parte) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E026 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7485 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The Court finds that the Respondent acted within the law, accorded the parties a fair hearing, and observed the rules of natural justice.
-
Manyara v Mwiti & another (Environment and Land Appeal E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7402 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is meritless and dismissed.
-
Nganga v Ntiapuyuk & 13 others (Land Case E003 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7447 (KLR) (30 October 2025) (Ruling)
✦ The application should be dismissed with costs to the Plainti because striking them out would be unjust.