Kenyan case law
-
NYAMU KIARA KIUNGA v STEPHEN NDUBI [2002] KEHC 982 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is dismissed, and the appellant is ordered to bear his own costs of the appeal and the case below.
-
PETER KIMANI NJIRIRI v PRISCILLAH NALIAKA WELIKHE [2002] KEHC 899 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs
-
In the matter of S.S.B (an Infant) [2002] KEHC 987 (KLR)
✦ The court grants the application to dispense with the parents' consent and grants the adoption order.
-
BLUE SHEILD INSURANCE CO. LTD v RICHARD MWANIKI THUKU & ANOTHER [2002] KEHC 876 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is dismissed with costs
-
DOSHI & COMPANY (HARDWARE) LTD. v NIAZONS KENYA LIMITED [2002] KEHC 700 (KLR)
✦ Application for stay of judgment is dismissed with costs.
-
In re Baby S K B [2002] KEHC 2 (KLR)
✦ The court grants the application to dispense with the parents' consent and grants the adoption order.
-
MARRY WANJIKU GAKURU v JOHN KABITI MWANGI [2002] KEHC 897 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is dismissed with costs.
-
REPUBLIC vs THE COMMISSIONER OF LANDS Ex Parte KHELEF KHALIFA and 5 Others [2002] KEHC 227 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed and orders granted as prayed.
-
R.W.M v F.N.N [2002] KEHC 293 (KLR)
✦ The court dissolves the marriage and orders the respondent to pay the costs of the divorce petition.
-
ROHIT A. SHAH & ANR. v MOHANLAL L.SHAH & TWO OTHERS [2002] KEHC 755 (KLR)
✦ The court allows Reena Sunil Shah's application to be joined as a co-plaintiff for the purpose of pursuing her interest in L.R. No. 209/96/31.
-
KENNEDY NGUGI KINYORO v REPUBLIC [2002] KEHC 479 (KLR)
✦ Convictions and sentences quashed due to serious lapses in investigation and evidence admissibility
-
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v NAIVASHA RURAL SAVINGS & CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD [2002] KEHC 888 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is strongly arguable and the order of the Cooperative Tribunal is hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of this appeal.
-
In Re ALIBHAI K. NATHOO VIRAN (Deceased) [2002] KEHC 992 (KLR)
✦ The court dismissed the application for dependency, finding no evidence to support the claim and that the applicant was not provided for in the deceased's will.
-
CHRISTOPHER KIBET v NAIROBI CITY COUNCIL [2002] KEHC 637 (KLR)
✦ The court is satisfied that the plaintiffs have shown that the land in which their houses are located is in real danger of alienation and that it is just and equitable to protect their interest.
-
JOHN NG’ANG’A KANINI vs NAOMI WAITHIRA CHEGE [2002] KEHC 873 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is allowed, the 1997 order is set aside, and the case is remanded to Kiambu Senior Principal Magistrates Court for hearing on merit.
-
REPUBLIC vs THE PRINCIPAL LANDS ADJUDICATION OFFICE , THE CHIEF LANDS REGISTRAR & ANOTHER [2002] KEHC 231 (KLR)
✦ The application is struck out with costs to the Respondents and the interested parties
-
MOHAMMED ADALA MISOLO v REPUBLIC [2002] KEHC 398 (KLR)
✦ The convictions are quashed and the sentences are set aside due to the lack of independent reliable evidence.
-
In Re UMI OMAR MOHAMED ALSO KNOWN AS UMI MOHAMED ALI-AMINI [2002] KEHC 997 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed, and the grant is revoked. The grantees are ordered to pay costs jointly and severally.
-
SHARIFF MOHAMED A. OMAR vs YUSUF SHAA MOHAMED A. OMAR [2002] KEHC 943 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs
-
NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED vs MOMBASA HOMES SERVICES LIMITED [2002] KEHC 639 (KLR)
✦ The court declines to grant the stay and dismisses the application with costs.
-
KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY vs AMARCO (KENYA) LIMITED [2002] KEHC 585 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed and orders are granted as prayed in the plaint with costs of this application.
-
JUBILEE HARDWARES LIMITED vs HANS KOSCHANY [2002] KEHC 906 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs as there was inordinate delay in making the application and the issue of the correct amount has never been raised by the defendant.
-
JULIUS MURIUKI NDIGOYA vs REPUBLIC [2002] KEHC 452 (KLR)
✦ The conviction for apart causing actual bodily harm is quashed and the sentence is set aside. The conviction for malicious damage to property is upheld. The appellant is ordered to pay a fine of Kshs.5000/- in default of which he will serve four (4) months imprisonment.
-
WILLIAM MUREITHI S/O KIMARU & ANOTHER vs GEOFFREY NJOGU MURIUKI & 6 OTHERS [2002] KEHC 587 (KLR)
✦ The court finds that the Defendants have unlawfully trespassed on the suit property and that the caution registered against the title to the suit property was without any just cause. The Plaintiffs are free to deal with the suit property in any manner they deem fit, including parting with the same for free. The Plaintiffs have proved their case against the Defendants No. 1 – No. 6 on a balance of probabilities.
-
E M M vs M W M [2002] KEHC 555 (KLR)
✦ The court grants an order of divorce, custody of the children to the petitioner, and awards costs to the petitioner.