Kenyan case law
-
Republic v Anthony Kinyanjui Kimani [2007] KEHC 3748 (KLR)
✦ The accused is found guilty of murder and sentenced to death
-
ERIC KIMANI MUIRURI v BOARD OF GOVERNORS, UPPER HILL SCHOOL & another [2007] KEHC 3338 (KLR)
✦ The decision to expel the applicant is quashed, and he is ordered to be re-admitted to the school unconditionally.
-
PETER M’IMARIA v JULIUS BARIU M’ITOBI [2007] KEHC 1450 (KLR)
✦ The Applicant is no longer on the suit land and the Respondent's eviction was in accordance with the decree
-
DESTA MUTEGEKI v REPUBLIC [2007] KEHC 1699 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is allowed, the conviction and sentence are quashed, and the appellant is released.
-
PETER M’IMARIA v JULIUS BARIU M’ITOBI [2007] KEHC 76 (KLR)
✦ The Applicant is no longer on the suit land and the police involvement in the execution was not necessary.
-
TONNY DHIMAN v REPUBLIC (? 446 of 2007) [2007] KEHC 49 (KLR) (18 September 2007) (Ruling)
✦ The applicant was admitted to bail pending appeal in the sum of Kshs.10,000/= with surety for an equal amount.
-
JACOB MIRITI v SAMUEL MWANGI [2007] KEHC 1352 (KLR)
✦ The application is without merit and dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
-
CHARLES A. OKELLO v KAIRU ENTEPRISES LTD [2007] KEHC 2108 (KLR)
✦ The application to correct the decree is granted
-
BERNARD NYAGA KIMOTHO v NJUGUNA DANIEL NGANGA [2007] KEHC 30 (KLR)
✦ The judgment of the Tribunal is set aside, and the appellant is awarded costs of the appeal.
-
Josphat Mureu Gatuguta & 2 others v Howse & Mcgeorge Ltd & another [2007] KEHC 2049 (KLR)
✦ The plaintiffs are entitled to both general and special damages from the 1st defendant.
-
MUSLIM HUMAN RIGHTS FORUM v REPUBLIC [2007] KEHC 3347 (KLR)
✦ The police officers are ordered to appear in court on October 8, 2007, to explain their non-attendance.
-
Republic v Nahashon Ngugi Gatarwa & 3 others [2007] KEHC 3746 (KLR)
✦ The court finds that none of the accused persons has a case to answer and acquits them.
-
MBULU MUSYIMI SUMBI v REPUBLIC [2007] KEHC 2051 (KLR)
✦ The court upheld the conviction and sentence, finding that the appellant pleaded guilty voluntarily and that the offence is serious.
-
Arog v Republic (Criminal Appeal 110 of 2006) [2007] KEHC 3747 (KLR) (Crim) (17 September 2007) (Judgment)
✦ The sentence was manifestly harsh and excessive, and was substituted with a ten-year term of imprisonment.
-
CLAUS U. KRIEGER (T/a CONTACT PRODUCTION AFRICA) v EPSILON BROADCAST ENGINEERING (K) LIMITED [2007] KEHC 650 (KLR)
✦ The application is struck out with costs to the Defendant as it is misconceived and the Plaintiff should have appealed against the judgment of 4th May, 2004.
-
DAWOOD KHAN M. KHAN v EABS BANK LIMITED [2007] KEHC 1958 (KLR)
✦ The court finds the defendant's statement of defence untenable and strikes it out with costs.
-
ROBERT MUGAMBA NABUSABA v REPUBLIC [2007] KEHC 1251 (KLR)
✦ The appellant was rightly convicted on the two charges of handling stolen property. The sentence is set aside and substituted with concurrent sentences of three years' imprisonment.
-
Blue Sky EPZ Limited v Natalia Polyakova & another [2007] KEHC 1998 (KLR)
✦ The court grants the application to strike out the Defendants' defence in respect of the claim for US$31,979, and enters judgment for the Plaintiff in that amount. The claim for US$20,000 will proceed to trial.
-
MARGARET SOARES v JANE OTIENO [2007] KEHC 683 (KLR)
✦ The application is clearly misconceived and must be struck out
-
DEVCON GROUP LIMITED v UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI [2007] KEHC 1985 (KLR)
✦ The application for consolidation of the suits is dismissed with costs.
-
JOHN GODANA GUYO v FOOD FOR THE HUNGURY INTERNATIONAL [2007] KEHC 681 (KLR)
✦ The court extended the time for the Defendant to make the deposit
-
JACOB MWONGO & 6 OTHERS v KENYA TEA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 638 (KLR)
✦ The application for dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution is refused. The Plaintiffs are given one more opportunity to prosecute the suit.
-
MARGARET SOARES v JANE OTIENO [2007] KEHC 1994 (KLR)
✦ The application is struck out as it is incompetent and must be struck out. An appropriate application under rule 10 of Order I of the Rules should be made.
-
BASIL CRITICOS v AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 651 (KLR)
✦ The Plaintiff's suit against the Defendants is hereby dismissed under Order 16, rule 5(d) of the Civil Procedure Rules, with costs to the Defendants.
-
DEVCON GROUP LIMITED v UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI [2007] KEHC 668 (KLR)
✦ The application for consolidation of the suits is dismissed with costs.