Kenyan case law
-
JULIUS WANGO OLALE v REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 1106 (KLR)
✦ The applications are dismissed as the one-day delay was sufficiently explained and not inordinate.
-
AFRICAN AUTO SUPPLIES LTD v ATTORNEY GENERAL [2009] KEHC 512 (KLR)
✦ Application is fatally defective and dismissed with costs.
-
ONESMUS NZOMBO NZAVI & 2 others v REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 2385 (KLR)
✦ The appeals are dismissed with the death sentence affirmed for Count 2 and the suspension of the death sentence for Count 3 until execution of the first or any further orders.
-
JULIUS WANGO OLALE v REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 1163 (KLR)
✦ The applications are dismissed as the one day delay was sufficiently explained and not inordinate.
-
COUNTY COUNCIL OF MAKUENI v PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT MAKUENI [2009] KEHC 1984 (KLR)
✦ The Court grants leave to apply for an order of certiorari and prohibition, and orders a stay of the decision in issue.
-
JOSEPHAT NYARONGI ONDIEKI V REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 2569 (KLR)
✦ The accused's Constitutional rights were not violated and the hearing should proceed in the normal manner before the trial court.
-
MWALIMU KALAMA FONDO v REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 1542 (KLR)
✦ The conviction is upheld, and the sentence of seven years imprisonment is confirmed.
-
JOSEPH MAINA GOKO v TRANSPORT LICENSING BOARD & others [2009] KEHC 2240 (KLR)
✦ The application is struck out with costs to the respondents.
-
IRENE JANET EBIFA v RODGERS MUNONIA WANDERA [2009] KEHC 1945 (KLR)
✦ The court dismisses the appellant's application for stay of execution of the decree and warrant pending appeal.
-
JULIUS WANGO OLALE v REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 710 (KLR)
✦ The applications are dismissed as the one day delay was sufficiently explained and not inordinate.
-
JACINTA WANGARI MACHARIA v ATTORNEY GENERAL & 2 others [2009] KEHC 1895 (KLR)
✦ The judge disqualified himself from hearing the matter due to the remarks made.
-
REPUBLIC V NANCY NJERI MUIGAI [2009] KEHC 2956 (KLR)
✦ The constitutional rights of the accused were flagrantly violated due to the prolonged delay in bringing her to court.
-
JOHN MANG’UYE & another v SENIOR RESIDENT MAGISRATE KITUI [2009] KEHC 1987 (KLR)
✦ The court grants leave to institute judicial review orders and quashes the proceedings in Kitui SRMCC No. 321/2009, and orders a stay of the proceedings.
-
BONIFACE NZOMO MASILA & ANOTHER V REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 2387 (KLR)
✦ The convictions are quashed, sentences are set aside, and the accused are ordered to be released.
-
. BONIFACE NZOMO MASILA & ANOTHER V REPUBLIC [2009] KEHC 2389 (KLR)
✦ The convictions are quashed, sentences set aside, and the accused are ordered to be released.
-
PEWIN SUPPLIES LIMITED v PERMANENT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS [2009] KEHC 2239 (KLR)
✦ The application is granted
-
RUMBA KINUTHIA V K.T.N. BARAZA [2009] KEHC 2265 (KLR)
✦ The words complained of are a fair and accurate report of Justice Lenaola's ruling and enjoy absolute privilege under section 6 of the Defamation Act, thus making the Defendant free from liability to the Plaintiff in defamation.
-
MBUGUA & MBUGUA ADVOCATES v KENINDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD [2009] KEHC 2637 (KLR)
✦ The Taxing Officer erred in principle in awarding getting up fees for a trial that never took place and which had not been confirmed. The Taxing Officer also erred in awarding VAT as against instruction fees. The Taxing Officer’s award on perusals and correspondences is upheld.
-
REPUBLIC V MIRIAM NJAMBI KAMAU [2009] KEHC 2987 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed as the explanation given for the delay is reasonable and plausible under the circumstances.
-
KABERIA M’KUCHIANA v PETER KAMANJA [2009] KEHC 2618 (KLR)
✦ The appeal is allowed, the orders of 4.09.2003 are set aside and the fine of Ksh.10,000/- is refunded to the appellant.
-
PETER MUIRURI KABIRU V PAUL WANDATI KABUE [2009] KEHC 2100 (KLR)
✦ The court found the Verifying Affidavit defective and contrary to the Oaths and Statutory Declaration Act.
-
NJUGUNA NGUNJIRI & 6 OTHERS V SAVINGS & LOAN (K) LTD & 5 OTHERS [2009] KEHC 3053 (KLR)
✦ The plaintiffs lack a platform on which to stand to mount a challenge to the validity of the charge and have failed to cross the first hurdle placed on their path to establish their bona fides to file this suit against the defendant bank.
-
KANTAI & CO. ADVOCATES v THOMAS NJUNGE T/A NJUNGE INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY [2009] KEHC 1126 (KLR)
✦ The court grants the notice motion dated 18th August 2008 for judgment under section 51 of the advocate's Act.
-
JOHN KAMAU NJUGUNA & 4 others v EMILIO MWANGI T/A CIRCUIT INVESTMENT & another [2009] KEHC 3018 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed with costs to the applicant.
-
MOTICHAND VIRPAL SHAH & 3 OTHERS V INVESTMENT & MORTGAGES BANK LTD & 2 OTHERS [2009] KEHC 2478 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed, and the court orders the extension of time to file the objection to the taxation and a stay of execution of the defendant's taxed costs.