Kenyan case law
-
Mwadzuma Mwabwanga Julo v Republic [2001] KEHC 888 (KLR)
✦ The evidence against the appellants is not safe and the conviction is quashed.
-
Abdalla Hamisi Juma v Republic [2001] KEHC 296 (KLR)
✦ The offence was proved beyond reasonable doubt and the sentence is upheld.
-
Republic v Siyad Ibrahim Abass,Mohamed Abdi Maalim,Farah Ali Dolal & Mohammed Ahmed Jelle [2001] KEHC 191 (KLR)
✦ The court finds the accused not guilty of murder and acquits them.
-
Felix Anosike v Republic [2001] KEHC 95 (KLR)
✦ The applicants, Felix Anosike and Johnson Chukwu, be now released on their own bonds of Sh. One million each together with two sureties each in the like sum pending the trial.
-
EMPRESS DADGER COMPANY LIMITED vs KENYA CULTURAL CENTRE [2001] KEHC 465 (KLR)
✦ The court declines to hear the Notice of Motion and directs the case file to be returned to the Commercial Division of the High Court at Milimani or to any other Division or Section of the High Court.
-
AKIL FAKHRUDIN MOHAMEDALI & KARIM HASSANAL SHARIFF vs SHITAL R. PATEL & MURGIAN TRANSPORT (K) LIMITED [2001] KEHC 531 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed, and the case between the Third Party and the defendants will be heard at the same time as the plaintiffs' case.
-
Kairu Enterprises Ltd v Deposit Protection Fund Board & Adder Company Limited [2001] KEHC 152 (KLR)
✦ The application for injunction and prohibition is dismissed with costs.
-
REPUBLIC vs GACHANJA & OTHERS [2001] KEHC 197 (KLR)
✦ The statement was made voluntarily and is admissible in evidence
-
DAMWENA HASSAN MACHEA vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 887 (KLR)
✦ The conviction and sentence of death are upheld, and the appeal is dismissed.
-
SAMSON OCHIENG vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 62 (KLR)
✦ The conviction is quashed, and the appellant is ordered to be set at liberty.
-
MUTHOKA NGUMI & JOHN NDUDA MUSYIMI vs SAMMY K. MUTUNGA [2001] KEHC 689 (KLR)
✦ The court agrees with the appellants that the consent of 4.4.95 is still operative until the machinery is exhausted and final orders issue.
-
NDUNGU NJAU vs NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LTD. [2001] KEHC 868 (KLR)
✦ The Plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought and the Defendant is entitled to Shs.332,442 with interest thereon at court rates from the date of the filing of the plaint as well as costs thereon.
-
REPUBLIC vs WILSON GACHANJA [2001] KEHC 709 (KLR)
✦ The statement was made voluntarily and is admissible in evidence.
-
JAMES OKOTH NYARERO vs MOHAMED SHEIKH OMAR BIN DAHMAN T/A MALINDI BUS SERVICES [2001] KEHC 454 (KLR)
✦ The court finds the defendant liable for the accident and awards damages of Sh. 574,419/=
-
DAVID MACHARIA GACHANJA,OSMAN KIBWANA,MUIRU KARANJA & JOSEPH ONYANGO vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 301 (KLR)
✦ The sentence of 3 years for Counts 2 and 3 is enhanced to 8 years each, to run concurrently with the sentence for Count 1.
-
PHILLIP SILA & NICHOLAS MWANIA MUSAU vs ELIUD KIOKO & COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTERS CO. LTD [2001] KEHC 508 (KLR)
✦ Application to review the consent judgement is dismissed with costs
-
MONICAH DONALD vs MBURU WAMUGU [2001] KEHC 544 (KLR)
✦ The plaintiff is awarded Sh.120,000/= (One Hundred Twenty Thousand Shillings) plus costs and interest at the lower court rates.
-
EKENO LORUBUIN vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 231 (KLR)
✦ The appeals were allowed, and the convictions were quashed and set aside.
-
GEORGE AMARA vs THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES [2001] KEHC 129 (KLR)
✦ The application is outside the statutory period and cannot be saved in any way. It is hereby struck out with costs.
-
MARGARET ALIVIDZA vs L.Z. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION LTD [2001] KEHC 156 (KLR)
✦ The Court dismissed the Plaintiff's suit with costs, finding that the Plaintiff was unable to complete the sale within the stipulated period and that the Defendant was entitled to rescind the contract.
-
ERNIE CAMBELL & COMPANY LTD. vs GITHUNGURI DAIRY PLANT COMPANY LTD. [2001] KEHC 629 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed as the claim is for money due and payable by the Defendant, and there is no dispute between the parties regarding the claim.
-
COMMERCE BANK LTD vs PARADISO COURT LTD. & 3 OTHERS [2001] KEHC 612 (KLR)
✦ The application is allowed. The Plaintiff is granted leave to file the Reply to Defence within 5 days of the date of the judgment. The Respondents will have costs of the application.
-
JOHN NJUGUNA MURAYA vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 287 (KLR)
✦ The conviction is quashed and the sentence set aside, and the Appellant is ordered to be set at liberty.
-
JUMA MUCHEMI vs AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORATION [2001] KEHC 422 (KLR)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
-
PETER MURIGI NJIRWA vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 113 (KLR)
✦ The order of prohibition is hereby issued as prayed.