Kenyan case law
-
Obiero v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 266 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 93 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Claimant is no longer a party member of the 1st Respondent and his prayers are dismissed.
-
Barns v Orange Democratic Movement & 2 others (Complaint 259 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 376 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the complaint and orders that the nomination certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent is annulled and the Complainant is directed to be issued with the nomination certificate.
-
Lieta v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint (NRB) 245 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 174 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The County Appeals Tribunal's decision to nullify Lieta's win and award it to the 2nd Respondent was null, void, and of no effect.
-
Kiminza v Jubilee Party & another (Complaint 279 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 280 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal held that the direct nomination of Rachael Nyamai was unlawful and that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the complaint.
-
Kamau & 4 others v Party & 3 others (Complaint 250 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 173 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal has both original and appellate jurisdiction over disputes from party primaries. The nominations were not free and fair due to massive electoral irregularities.
-
Kasera v Orange Democratic Movement (Complaint 270 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 90 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Respondent is ordered to issue the Complainant the final nomination certificate as the Respondent's nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly, Kachieng Ward, Nyatike Constituency.
-
Luvai v Dolai & 2 others; Wiper Democratic Movement (Interested Party) (Complaint 96 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 72 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The Amended Claim dated 7th May 2017 is dismissed with no order as to costs
-
Omondi v Orange Democratic Movement Party; Were (Interested Party) (Complaint (NRB) 212 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 170 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs.
-
Noor v Jubilee Party & another (Complaint 244 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 95 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination exercise is incapable of determining a winner and the Tribunal intervenes to promote political party democracy.
-
Odhiambo v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 136 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 268 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The Tribunal allows the 2nd Respondent's application and orders her to file a replying affidavit and submissions by a specified date.
-
Hassan v Jubilee Party of Kenya & another (Complaint 256 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 94 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal has jurisdiction and the Claimant should be declared the nominee
-
Musyoka v Wiper Democratic Movement – Kenya & another (Complaint (NRB) 108 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 245 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with no order as to costs
-
Odhiambo v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 136 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 81 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The Tribunal allows the 2nd Respondent's application and orders her to file a replying affidavit and submissions by a specified date.
-
Maobe v Ondora & another (Complaint 112 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 77 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The complaint is dismissed with costs to the Respondents
-
Ofuo v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another (Complaint 240 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 399 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 1st Respondent's actions were against its own rules and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and the Tribunal orders the Claimant's case be allowed.
-
Onam & another v Orange Democratic Party & 5 others; Onam (Interested Party) (Complaint 137 (NRB) & 177 (NRB) of 2017 (Consolidated)) [2017] KEPPDT 63 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The application for review is granted, and the Tribunal's decision is recalled, reviewed, and set aside.
-
Chepkirui Damaris v Kipsang Mibei Kennedy & 2 others [2017] KEPPDT 26 (KLR)
✦ We find no merit in the Claimant's claims and dismiss the Notice of Motion.
-
Nyutu v Muturi & 3 others (Complaint 236 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 317 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal found in favor of the 1st Respondent, declaring him as the duly nominated candidate.
-
Ondiek v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 276 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 385 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds the complaint lacks merit and dismisses it.
-
Ogeto v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 239 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 276 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent is hereby revoked. The complainant is granted the nomination certificate for Riruta Ward, Nairobi County.
-
Orwa v Orange Democractic Movement Party & another (Complaint 241 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 249 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 1st Respondent's actions were not justified and the Claimant's case is allowed.
-
Booker Otieno Minami v Orange Democratic Movement & another [2017] KEPPDT 18 (KLR)
✦ The 2nd Respondent's Notice of Motion succeeds and the Tribunal directs that the 1st Respondent proceed to present the name of the 2nd Respondent as the nominee for Member of the County Assembly, East Gem Ward.
-
Minami v range Democratic Movement & another (Complaint (NRB) 138 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 267 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 2nd Respondent's Notice of Motion succeeds, and the Tribunal directs that the 1st Respondent present the name of the 2nd Respondent as the nominee for Member of the County Assembly, East Gem Ward.
-
Oyoo v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another (Complaint 253 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 387 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal holds in favor of Oyoo, declaring the final nomination certificate to Ochieng' null and void and ordering the 1st Respondent to submit Oyoo's name as the nominee.
-
Sigei v Kenya African National Union (Complaint 222 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 313 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds that the Respondent has the right to directly nominate a candidate under its Constitution and that the process was democratic and transparent.