Kenyan case law
-
Maobe v Ondora & another (Complaint 112 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 77 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The complaint is dismissed with costs to the Respondents
-
Lieta v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint (NRB) 245 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 174 (KLR) (19 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The County Appeals Tribunal's decision to nullify Lieta's win and award it to the 2nd Respondent was null, void, and of no effect.
-
Sigei v Kenya African National Union (Complaint 222 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 313 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds that the Respondent has the right to directly nominate a candidate under its Constitution and that the process was democratic and transparent.
-
Minami v range Democratic Movement & another (Complaint (NRB) 138 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 267 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 2nd Respondent's Notice of Motion succeeds, and the Tribunal directs that the 1st Respondent present the name of the 2nd Respondent as the nominee for Member of the County Assembly, East Gem Ward.
-
Oyoo v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another (Complaint 253 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 387 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal holds in favor of Oyoo, declaring the final nomination certificate to Ochieng' null and void and ordering the 1st Respondent to submit Oyoo's name as the nominee.
-
Ondiek v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 276 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 385 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds the complaint lacks merit and dismisses it.
-
Booker Otieno Minami v Orange Democratic Movement & another [2017] KEPPDT 18 (KLR)
✦ The 2nd Respondent's Notice of Motion succeeds and the Tribunal directs that the 1st Respondent proceed to present the name of the 2nd Respondent as the nominee for Member of the County Assembly, East Gem Ward.
-
Ofuo v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another (Complaint 240 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 399 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 1st Respondent's actions were against its own rules and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and the Tribunal orders the Claimant's case be allowed.
-
Nyutu v Muturi & 3 others (Complaint 236 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 317 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal found in favor of the 1st Respondent, declaring him as the duly nominated candidate.
-
Orwa v Orange Democractic Movement Party & another (Complaint 241 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 249 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The 1st Respondent's actions were not justified and the Claimant's case is allowed.
-
Onam & another v Orange Democratic Party & 5 others; Onam (Interested Party) (Complaint 137 (NRB) & 177 (NRB) of 2017 (Consolidated)) [2017] KEPPDT 63 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The application for review is granted, and the Tribunal's decision is recalled, reviewed, and set aside.
-
Chepkirui Damaris v Kipsang Mibei Kennedy & 2 others [2017] KEPPDT 26 (KLR)
✦ We find no merit in the Claimant's claims and dismiss the Notice of Motion.
-
Ogeto v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 239 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 276 (KLR) (18 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent is hereby revoked. The complainant is granted the nomination certificate for Riruta Ward, Nairobi County.
-
Oluoch v Muganda & 2 others (Complaint 127 of 2017 & Claim 152 of 2017 (Consolidated)) [2017] KEPPDT 424 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Ruling)
✦ The application is dismissed with costs to the Respondent/Complainant - Wilfred Odalo Oluoch.
-
Ondiek v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 276 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 88 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds the complaint lacks merit and dismisses it.
-
Onkangi v Amani National Congress Party & another (Complaint 233A of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 97 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination process was not free, fair and credible, and the correct methodology for determining the nominee is through a party primary process.
-
Ali v National Elections Board, ODM Party (Complaint 258 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 244 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds in favor of the Complainant and orders the NEB to submit the Complainant's name for gazettement.
-
Onkangi v Amani National Congress Party & another (Complaint 233B of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 375 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination process was not free, fair and credible, and the correct methodology is through a party primary process
-
Ochieng v Mbogo & 2 others (Complaint 246 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 395 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination exercises were conducted in accordance with the laid down procedures and rules. The results being declared by a stranger did not affect the outcome of the results.
-
Njenga v Mutungi & another (Complaint 234 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 246 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal orders that the Claimant's case be allowed, the 2nd Respondent be restrained from issuing the final nomination certificate, and the ballots for Kwa Reuben and Maendeleo Wards be tallied.
-
Omondi v Orange Democratic Movement; Arao (Interested Party) (Complaint 251 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 316 (KLR) (At Nairobi) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal holds that the Respondent has not justified its decision to deny the Claimant a nomination certificate and must issue a certificate within 24 hours
-
Nyamuthe v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 69 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 211 (KLR) (17 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The nomination of the 2nd Respondent, Dr. Lilian Gogo, as the 1st Respondent's nominee for the position of the Member of the National Assembly for Rangwe Constituency is hereby nullified.
-
Omondi & another v Orange Democratic Party & another (Complaint 171 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 229 (KLR) (16 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal upholds the 1st Respondent's NAT decision and orders a repeat of the nomination process within 48 hours.
-
Chapia v Orange Democratic Movement & another (Complaint 237 of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 203 (KLR) (16 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal finds that the nomination was valid as the claimant was involved in negotiations with the party leader and the 2nd Respondent to have Sifuna as the party's nominee.
-
Otuge v Orange Democratic Movement Party & 3 others (Complaint 203 (NRB) of 2017) [2017] KEPPDT 310 (KLR) (16 May 2017) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal orders that the Claimant's case be allowed with respect to prayer (b). The Respondent is restrained from issuing the final nomination certificate to any person for the position of the Member of County Assembly, Kolwa East Ward, Kisumu County. The Respondent is ordered to conduct fresh nominations within 48 hours of this judgment.