Kenyan case law
-
Intcon Africa Ltd v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 59 of 2017) [2021] KETAT 47 (KLR) (5 February 2021) (Judgment)
✦ The Respondent's assessment is upheld.
-
Samaritan's Purse v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 92 of 2017) [2021] KETAT 165 (KLR) (29 January 2021) (Judgment)
✦ The appeal is allowed, and the Objection Decision dated 18th April 2017 confirming the assessment of Kshs. 18,922,875.00 as PAYE is set aside.
-
De La Rue Currency & Security Print Ltd v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 395 of 2018) [2021] KETAT 40 (KLR) (29 January 2021) (Ruling)
-
Paleah Stores Limited v Commissioner of Investigations & Enforcement (Appeal 81 of 2017) [2021] KETAT 161 (KLR) (22 January 2021) (Judgment)
✦ The Appellant's appeal is dismissed. The Respondent's decision is upheld. The Appellant is ordered to pay Kshs. 8,326,605,185 in principal tax, penalties, and interest.
-
Kazimoni Auto Tyres Ltd v Commissioner of Investigations & Enforcement (Tax Appeal 355 of 2019) [2021] KETAT 94 (KLR) (Appeals) (22 January 2021) (Ruling)
✦ The Tribunal finds that the Applicant failed to demonstrate reasons for its delay in filing the appeal and dismisses the application.
-
Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 176 of 2016) [2020] KETAT 61 (KLR) (18 December 2020) (Judgment)
-
Bidco Oil Refineries Limited v Commissioner of Customs Services (Tax Appeal 150 of 2015) [2020] KETAT 58 (KLR) (18 December 2020) (Judgment)
-
Kiamba v Commissioner of Investigations & Enforcement (Appeal 183 of 2015) [2020] KETAT 64 (KLR) (11 December 2020) (Ruling)
-
Ali v Commissioner of Investigations & Enforcement (Appeal 353 of 2019) [2020] KETAT 52 (KLR) (11 December 2020) (Ruling)
-
Diara Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 31 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 85 (KLR) (4 December 2020) (Judgment)
-
Kifaru Enterprises Limited v Commissioner of Customs & Border Contol (Miscellaneous Application 52 of 2020) [2020] KETAT 69 (KLR) (27 November 2020) (Ruling)
-
Metal Stores Limited v Commissioner Customs & Border Control (Miscellaneous Application 53 of 2020) [2020] KETAT 70 (KLR) (27 November 2020) (Ruling)
-
United Millers Limited v Commissioner of Customs & Border Control (Tax Appeal 22 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 79 (KLR) (19 November 2020) (Judgment)
-
Nielsen v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 177 of 2016) [2020] KETAT 86 (KLR) (13 November 2020) (Judgment)
-
Kabora v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 15 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 68 (KLR) (30 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Osi Kenya Limited v Commissioner of Investigation & Enforcement (Appeal 27 of 2018) [2020] KETAT 74 (KLR) (30 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Kamindi Selfridges Supermarket Limited v Commissioner for Investigations and Enforcement (Appeal 52 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 73 (KLR) (30 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
National Bank of Kenya Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 14 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 56 (KLR) (23 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Dodwell and Company (EA) Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 63 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 91 (KLR) (Civ) (23 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Raffia Bags EA Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2018) [2020] KETAT 62 (KLR) (16 October 2020) (Ruling)
-
Isolux Ingenieria S.A v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 133 of 2017) [2020] KETAT 92 (KLR) (16 October 2020) (Judgment)
✦ The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed the Appellant to pay the outstanding taxes.
-
Feradon Associates Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 128 of 2016) [2020] KETAT 54 (KLR) (9 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Osho Drappers Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Appeal 159 of 2018) [2020] KETAT 59 (KLR) (9 October 2020) (Judgment)
-
Sea Submarine Communications Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes (Tax Appeal 153 of 2016) [2020] KETAT 87 (KLR) (2 October 2020) (Judgment)
✦ The Court of Appeal upholds the Commissioner's decision
-
Jomusons Investment Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes [2020] KETAT 49 (KLR)
✦ The Tribunal dismissed the application as the Applicant failed to demonstrate a reasonable reason for its delay in filing the appeal.