James Karanja Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 4 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2015 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil: The 2nd Defendant/Applicant’s applications were not inordina (1); The court grants the application for reinstatement of the su (1)
- Land Dispute: The application for stay of execution is dismissed. (1)
- Land Transaction Dispute: The Plaintifier’s Notice of Motion Application was dismissed, (1)
- Succession: The court dismissed the petitioners' application for letters (1); Injunction granted to prevent the sale of the property. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Law of Succession Act (1)
- Law of Succession Act Cap 160 (1)
- Probate and Administration Rules (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from an earlier order of the court (1), Appeal from a judgment granting a stay of execution (1), Appeal from a previous judgment and decree (1)
- [Civil] outcomes — The 2nd Defendant/Applicant’s applications were not inordinately filed, and the Court found that the 2nd Plaintiff has locus standi.: 1/2, The court grants the application for reinstatement of the suit.: 1/2
- [Land Dispute] outcomes — The application for stay of execution is dismissed.: 1/1
- [Land Transaction Dispute] outcomes — The Plaintifier’s Notice of Motion Application was dismissed, and the Defendants’ Notice of Motion Application was granted.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~20161 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Granting leave to file the Reply to Defence and Defence to Counterclaim of the 1st and 4th Defendants, further statements and documents and a pretrial bundle (4)
- Costs to the respondents. (1)
- Reinstatement of the suit for hearing and determination on merit (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (1), Civil Procedure Act (1), Civil Procedure Rules (1)
Sample decisions
Mwangi & another v James Karanja Komu t/a Rubis Service Station Murang’a & another; Mwangi & another (Intended Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case E005 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 20088 (KLR) (28 September 2023) (Ruling)
Environment & Land Court · [2023] KEELC 20088 (KLR) · 28 September 2023
Gilgil Cultural Association & another (Suing Through its Officials) Harrison Waweru Nganga) v Naivasha Land Registrar & 6 others (Environment & Land Case 444 of 2016 & 165 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELC 21026 (KLR) (19 October 2023) (Ruling)
Environment & Land Court · [2023] KEELC 21026 (KLR) · 19 October 2023
Gitau v Ng’ang’a & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 291 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 6483 (KLR) (30 September 2025) (Ruling)
Environment & Land Court · [2025] KEELC 6483 (KLR) · 30 September 2025
Gachui & 5 others v Frank Logistics Limited & 3 others (Environment and Land Case 282 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 8425 (KLR) (2 December 2025) (Ruling)
Environment & Land Court · [2025] KEELC 8425 (KLR) · 2 December 2025