Sm Kibun Beta

AI-derived reasoning profile from published judgments — experimental, verify everything against the decisions themselves.

Decisions45 Period2016-2023 Confidencemedium CourtsKEELC

Also appears asSM. KIBUN

Read this first — limitations.

Main subject areas

keelc (16)

Published decisions from 2015 to 2023; busiest year 2016 (36 decisions).

Interlocutory Injunction: Application dismissed (3); Application dismissed with costs (1)
Land Case: Dismissed (3); Judgment for the Plaintiff (1); Appeal dismissed (1)
Civil: Appeal dismissed (2); The notice of motion dated 19th March 2015 is granted in ter (1); The court ruled in favor of the Applicant. (1); The Plaintiff was ordered to provide security for costs. (1)
Land Dispute: Judgment for the Plaintiffs (1); Adagala's application was dismissed. (1); Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, allowing his claims for (1); Interim restraining orders granted (1)
Land Registration Dispute: Oneya is declared the owner of the land parcel East Gem/Anyi (1)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial (3), Appeal from an original trial decision (2), Ex parte application for leave to file mandamus (1)
[Civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 2/8, The notice of motion dated 19th March 2015 is granted in terms of prayer (1) with costs to abide the outcome of the substantive application.: 1/8, The court ruled in favor of the Applicant.: 1/8, The Plaintiff was ordered to provide security for costs.: 1/8
[Land Dispute] outcomes — Judgment for the Plaintiffs: 1/3, Adagala's application was dismissed.: 1/3, Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, allowing his claims for an injunction and declaration of ownership.: 1/3
[Interlocutory Injunction] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/2, Application dismissed with costs: 1/2
[Land Registration Dispute] outcomes — Oneya is declared the owner of the land parcel East Gem/Anyiko/965 under adverse possession.: 1/1
[Eviction and Permanent Injunction] outcomes — In favor of the Plaintiff: 1/1

Disclosure of details concerning the creation of parcels Nyamonye/Abidha village/1683, 1685 and 2417 and consent to sue (1)
Permanent injunction (1)
None (1)
Security for costs (1)
The plaintiff is ordered to take steps within 90 days to set down the case for hearing. (1)

Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
Frequently applied statutes: Land Adjudication Act (1), Land Consolidation Act (1), Land Adjudication Act, Chapter 284 (1), Land Registered Act No.3 of 2012 (1), Limitation of Actions Act Chapter 22 of Laws of Kenya (1)