Per Sachs Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2018 to 2020; busiest year 2020 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review: The court did not proceed with contempt proceedings. (1); The ex parte applicant is in contempt of court and is denied (1); The court declared the Respondent and its Vice Chairman in c (1); The applicant's application for Mandamus and costs is grante (1)
- Petition for Fundamental Rights and Free: The Petitioner was ordered to be committed to Civil Jail for (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Contempt of Court Act (1)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (1)
- Public Procurement and Disposal Regulations, 2006 (1)
- Constitution of the Republic of Kenya 2010 (1)
- Fair Administrative Action Act No.4 of 2015 (1)
- Fair Administrative Action Act 2015 (1)
- Civil Procedure Act 94 (1)
- Judicature Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a previous judgment (2), Appeal from a decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board (1), Respondents' appeal from a lower court decision (1)
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — The ex parte applicant is in contempt of court and is denied the right of audience.: 1/5, The court declared the Respondent and its Vice Chairman in contempt of court and ordered sanctions against the Vice Chairman.: 1/5, The court did not proceed with contempt proceedings.: 1/5, The applicant's application for Mandamus and costs is granted: 1/5
- [Petition for Fundamental Rights and Freedoms] outcomes — The Petitioner was ordered to be committed to Civil Jail for Contempt of Court.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~56106 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Sanction Prof. Paul Wainanina as deemed fit and appropriate including jailing him for six months. (1)
- Order the Respondent to forthwith admit the applicant as ordered by the court. (1)
- Execution of the decree before taxation of costs (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 4.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (1), Public Procurement and Disposal Regulations, 2006 (1), Constitution of the Republic of Kenya 2010 (1), Fair Administrative Action Act No.4 of 2015 (1), Fair Administrative Action Act 2015 (1)
Sample decisions
Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others; Ex-Parte Central Kenya Fresh Merchants Limited [2018] KEHC 1203 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 1203 (KLR) · 11 December 2018
Migiro Chadwick Kerama Mathius v Kenya School of Law & 3 others [2018] KEHC 9058 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 9058 (KLR) · 19 April 2018
Republic v Kenyatta University Ex parte Losem Naomi Chepkemoi [2019] KEHC 11053 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2019] KEHC 11053 (KLR) · 25 February 2019
Noreen Shariff & others, as administrators of the estate of Jim Choge v Chief Land Registrar & 2 others; Amusement Garden Limited (Interested Party) [2019] KEHC 2184 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2019] KEHC 2184 (KLR) · 20 November 2019
Republic v Attorney General & another Exparte Mike Maina Kamau [2020] KEHC 10013 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 10013 (KLR) · 18 August 2020
Samuel M. N. Mweru & Others v National Land Commission & 2 others [2020] KEHC 9233 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 9233 (KLR)