Martha Koome Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 901 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2002 to 2026; busiest year 2014 (130 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (84); Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed (8); Affirmed (6); Appeal successful (4)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (63); Affirmed (19); Appeal allowed (12); Appeal dismissed with costs (7)
- Succession: Appeal dismissed (11); Application dismissed (10); Application dismissed with costs (4)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (10)
- Civil: Application dismissed (8); Appeal dismissed (6); Dismissed (6)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (63)
- Law of Succession Act (57)
- Civil Procedure Rules (54)
- Penal Code (52)
- Criminal Procedure Code (49)
- Evidence Act (22)
- Sexual Offences Act (20)
- Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (18)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the High Court judgment (29), Second Appeal (26), Appeal from a High Court judgment (24)
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 79/201, Appeal allowed: 6/201, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 5/201, Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, death sentence set aside: 4/201
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 25/76, Appeal allowed: 8/76, Dismissed: 3/76, The application is granted.: 2/76
- [civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 27/56, Affirmed: 6/56, Appeal allowed: 4/56, Appeal successful: 2/56
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 111/497, Application dismissed: 47/497, Dismissed: 34/497, Appeal allowed: 27/497
- [Succession] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~17822 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set the appellant at liberty (3)
- Costs to the appellant (3)
- Set the appellants at liberty (2)
- Stay of execution of the decree (2)
- General damages (2)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (48), Criminal Procedure Code (41), Court of Appeal Rules (25), Employment Act (25), Civil Procedure Act (21)
Sample decisions
John Njuguna Wainaina v Republic [2006] KECA 301 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2006] KECA 301 (KLR) · 3 March 2006
James Munyi Thiong’o v Republic [2006] KECA 302 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2006] KECA 302 (KLR)
Norman Ambich Miero & another v Republic [2012] KECA 100 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 100 (KLR) · 24 February 2012
Kenya Pipeline Company Limited v Hyosung Ebara Company Limited & 2 others [2012] KECA 104 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 104 (KLR) · 31 July 2012
Safe Rentals Limited v Leisure Lodge Limited T/a Leisure Lodge Hotel Club Casino [2012] KECA 105 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 105 (KLR) · 19 July 2012
Charles Agina V Shipmarc Ltd & another [2012] KECA 106 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 106 (KLR) · 19 July 2012
Stephen Muange Mutua v Kariuki Kirubi & another [2012] KECA 109 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 109 (KLR)
Afrofreight Forwarders Limited v James Mwaiwa Wambua [2012] KECA 110 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 110 (KLR) · 19 July 2012
Emilio Kinyua Njeru v Republic [2012] KECA 111 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 111 (KLR) · 5 July 2012
Julius Irungu Wanu v Republic [2012] KECA 113 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 113 (KLR) · 5 July 2012