Frasia Wangari Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 5 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2022 to 2026; busiest year 2023 (131 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (50); Appeal allowed (7); The appeal is dismissed. (5); The appeal was dismissed. (4)
- Civil Suit: The application is dismissed. (5); Application dismissed (3); Appeal dismissed (3); The appeal was dismissed. (2)
- Commercial Appeal: Appeal dismissed (4)
- Commercial Suit: Appeal dismissed (3)
- Miscellaneous Civil Application: Application dismissed (3); Judgment in favor of the Applicant (2); The application is dismissed. (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (75)
- Civil Procedure Rules (37)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (19)
- Advocates Act (10)
- Arbitration Act (6)
- Evidence Act (5)
- Limitation of Actions Act (5)
- Sexual Offences Act (4)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from original trial (1), Appeal from the original trial (1), Respondent's appeal from a decision of the Industrial Property Tribunal (1)
- [Infringement Proceedings] outcomes — The cases were consolidated and heard together.: 1/1
- [Patent Revocation and Infringement] outcomes — Affirmed: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — The infringement claims are dismissed with costs.: 1/1
- [Infringement and Revocation of Utility Models] outcomes — Dismissed: 1/1
- [Patent Infringement and Revocation] outcomes — The 1st and 2nd Respondent's request for revocation of patent KE 842 is allowed.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~46309 words
- Includes panel decisions
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.4
- Frequently applied statutes: Industrial Property Act 2001 (4), Industrial Property Tribunal Rules 2002 (3), Industrial Property Act (1), Industrial Property Tribunal Rules (1)
Sample decisions
Zaidat Limited v Fenesi Management Limited & another (IPT Case 86, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92 & 93 of 2020 (Consolidated)) [2022] KEIPT 861 (KLR) (Civ) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2022] KEIPT 861 (KLR) · 31 August 2022
Metro-Poly Kenya Limited v Ratilal (IPT Case 97 of 2021) [2022] KEIPT 862 (KLR) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2022] KEIPT 862 (KLR) · 31 August 2022
Kenrub Limited v Metro-Poly Kenya Limited (IPT Case 98 of 2021) [2022] KEIPT 863 (KLR) (Civ) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2022] KEIPT 863 (KLR) · 31 August 2022
Kibo Capital Group Limited & another v Safaricom PLC (Tribunal Case 96 of 2021) [2022] KEIPT 872 (KLR) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2022] KEIPT 872 (KLR) · 31 August 2022
Akuon v Safaricom PLC & 2 others (IPT Case 95 of 2020) [2022] KEIPT 873 (KLR) (Civ) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2022] KEIPT 873 (KLR) · 31 August 2022